TITLE

Implementation of OMB Circular No. A-76 at Science Agencies: GAO-07-434R

PUB. DATE
April 2007
SOURCE
GAO Reports;4/16/2007, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Government Documents
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Congress requested that GAO determine how the Department of Commerce (National Institute for Standards and Technology and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) have implemented the May 2003 revised Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-76 process, which seeks to put commercial activities now performed by government out for public-private competition. Congress was particularly interested in outcomes where public-private competitions resulted in commercial activities being contracted out to the private sector. On December 14, 2006, we briefed Congress on the preliminary results of our review. This report is an updated version of the briefing document we used. In summary, we found that the five science agencies under the Committee's jurisdiction generally implemented the A-76 process as revised in May 2003. However, we did find one exception and two deviations. The exception involved the Department of Commerce, which had not put out for competition any commercial activity performed by National Institute for Standards and Technology personnel. Additionally, OMB granted deviations to the new A-76 process requirements for two other agencies. OMB allowed NASA to put out for competition new commercial scientific and technological research activities--called NASA Research Announcements--outside the normal A-76 process. Nearly all of NASA's public-private competitions have been competed under this deviation. OMB also approved the Department of Energy's pilot program for determining whether use of the General Services Administration's Multiple Award Schedules would increase competition. We also found that, while the five agencies generally implemented the A-76 process, few of the hundreds of commercial activities they determined suitable for public-private competition were competed. According to agencies officials, agencies recognized that activities performed by 10 or fewer employees were so small that the costs of conducting public-private competitions would outweigh any expected savings. Finally, we found that the private sector won few of the science agency activities put out for competition. Specifically, from fiscal year 2003 through fiscal year 2005, the agencies held 22 public-private competitions. In-house organizations won 19 of these competitions and the private sector won 3. The agencies estimated that the contracts for the three activities won by the private sector were performed by 337 federal employees and would save over $45 million.
ACCESSION #
24733374

 

Related Articles

  • GAO Backs NASA's Choice Of Boeing, SpaceX For Commercial Crew Vehicles. Morring Jr., Frank // Aerospace Daily & Defense Report;1/6/2015, Vol. 251 Issue 1, p1 

    The article reports on the claims of attorneys at the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) rejecting the argument of electronic systems provider Sierra Nevada Corp. that the National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA) overemphasized the development schedule for its selection of...

  • Project on Track but May Benefit from Improved Contractor Data to Better Understand Costs. Chaplain, Cristina T. // GAO Reports;12/17/2015, preceding p1 

    The article focuses on the report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) on James Webb space telescope (JWST) project of National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and improved contractor data to better understanding of costs and benefits of the project. Topics discussed...

  • Concerted Effort Needed to Improve Federal Performance Measures. Wilshusen, Gregory C. // GAO Reports;10/29/2009, preceding p1 

    The article reports on the study conducted by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) on the need to improve federal performance measures for information security through joint efforts by experts and leading organizations. It notes that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) does not...

  • Senate Takes Up NASA Bill With More Constellation Money Than House Plan. Rutherford, Emelie // Defense Daily;10/6/2009, Vol. 244 Issue 4, p4 

    The article reports that a U.S. Senate panel considered a National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) spending bill by calling to give NASA 3.94 billion dollars for exploration efforts including the Constellation program. A sum of 3.96 billion dollars was requested by president Barack...

  • Long Pole. Morring Jr., Frank // Aviation Week & Space Technology;1/14/2013, Vol. 175 Issue 1, p16 

    The article focuses on the effect of funding uncertainty on the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) planning for human exploration of space. It mentions that Congress took time out from budget negotiations to state its continued support for NASA's plans to send astronauts...

  • Additional Cost Transparency and Design Criteria Needed for National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Projects. Chaplain, Cristina // GAO Reports;3/3/2011, p1 

    The article presents the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) report on the additional cost transparency and design criteria needed for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) projects. It mentions that NASA did not provide enough transparency into costs during its early...

  • KNOCKING A-76. Peckenpaugh, Jason // Government Executive;Aug2001, Vol. 33 Issue 10, p14 

    Focuses on the United States Office of Management and Budget's Circular A-76, which details the government's public-private competition process. Recommendation by several individuals that the circular be abolished; Highlights of a hearing on the issue conducted by the US General Accounting...

  • Federal Acquisition Regulation; Submission for OMB Review; Contractors Performing Private Security Functions Outside the United States. Clark, William // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;11/27/2012, Vol. 77 Issue 228, p70780 

    The article focuses on a notice issued by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) and the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) regarding solicitation of comments on the proposed information collection (IC) submitted to the U.S. Office...

  • Federal Acquisition Regulation; Information Collection; Corporate Aircraft Costs. Auletta, Laura // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;4/3/2012, Vol. 77 Issue 64, p20012 

    The article offers information on a notice issued by the U.S. General Services Administration and National Aeronautics and Space Administration requesting public comments on a proposed information collection request (ICR) related to the regulations on traveling costs and records of flights used...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics