Plutonium imports to proceed

November 1999
Natural Life;Nov/Dec99, Issue 70, p11
Reports on the decision of the Canadian government to proceed with the import of weapons-grade plutonium fuel (MOX) into Canada from the United States and Russia. Move as part of a US proliferation project to obtain information on CANDU reactors; Terms of the deal.


Related Articles

  • Utilization of nuclear waste plutonium and thorium mixed fuel in candu reactors. Şahin, Sümer; Şarer, Başar; Çelik, Yurdunaz // International Journal of Energy Research;Nov2016, Vol. 40 Issue 14, p1901 

    Spent nuclear fuel out of conventional light water reactors contains significant amount of even plutonium isotopes, so called reactor grade plutonium. Excellent neutron economy of Canada deuterium uranium (CANDU) reactors can further burn reactor grade plutonium, which has been used as a booster...

  • Novel electromagnetic technique for repositioning of coolant tube spacers in CANDU nuclear reactors. Dableh, Joseph H. // Review of Scientific Instruments;Jun86, Vol. 57 Issue 6, p1201 

    A novel electromagnetic technique to reposition the coolant tube spacers in the fuel channels of CANDU nuclear reactors was successfully developed in the fall of 1983 at Ontario Hydro Research Division. The need to reposition dislocated spacers in noncommissioned reactors was discovered...

  • Energy Remix: Reactors or Renewables? Shenker, Mira // ReNew Canada;2010, Vol. 6 Issue 4, p4 

    The article discusses various reports published within the issue, including one on the debate over the future of the nuclear energy in Canada, one on Canada deuterium uranium (CANDU) reactors, and another on the Green Energy and Green Economy Act.

  • CANDU Capacities. Mawson, Colin A. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;May1978, Vol. 34 Issue 5, p4 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article"Uranium Cartel," by M. Martin in the February 1978 issue.

  • Clarifying CANDU. Meneley, Dan // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Mar/Apr2006, Vol. 62 Issue 2, p7 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Nuclear Power: No Can-Do?," by Paul Webster in the January/February 2006 issue.

  • Clarifying CANDU.  // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Mar/Apr2006, Vol. 62 Issue 2, p25 

    A response by Paul Webster to a letter to the editor about his article "Nuclear Power: No Can-Do?" in the January/February 2006 issue.

  • The CANDU can. Eatock, Albert // New Scientist;9/6/2008, Vol. 199 Issue 2672, p25 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article on CANDU reactors in the August 2, 2008 issue.

  • Recycling is better than reprocessing. Varley, James // Modern Power Systems;Dec2010, Vol. 30 Issue 12, p15 

    In this article the author comments on the aspects of reprocessing of continuous welded rail (LWR) spent fuel, particularly on the dissolution of nitric acid and separation of plutonium through the Purex process. The author is particular on Japan's delayed Rokkashomura reprocessing plant has...

  • Pricing up Candu reactors. Ross, Priscilla // International Power Generation;Nov/Dec2002, Vol. 25 Issue 9/10, p33 

    Focuses on the financial and technological aspects of the Quinshan nuclear power project in China, due to be completed in 2003. Basis for the plant financing established by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development; Provision of financial assistance by Atomic Energy of Canada...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics