TITLE

Mortality in Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Comparison of Patients Managed by Vascular Specialists and General Practitioners

AUTHOR(S)
Brevetti, Gregorio; Oliva, Gabriella; Giugliano, Giuseppe; Schiano, Vittorio; De Maio, Julieta Isabel; Chiariello, Massimo
PUB. DATE
May 2007
SOURCE
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine;May2007, Vol. 22 Issue 5, p639
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is undertreated by general practitioners (GPs). However, the impact of the suboptimal clinical management is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the mortality rate of PAD patients in relation to the type of physician who provides their care (GP or vascular specialist). DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Primary care practice and academic vascular laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: GP patients (n = 60) were those of the Peripheral Arteriopathy and Cardiovascular Events study (PACE). Patients managed by specialists (it =82) were consecutive subjects with established PAD who were referred to our vascular laboratory during the enrolment period of the PACE study. MEASUREMENTS: All-cause and cardiovascular mortality. RESULTS: After 32 months of follow-up, specialist management was associated with a lower rate of all- cause mortality (RR=0.04; 95% CI 0.01-0.34; p=.003) and cardiovascular mortality (RR=0.07; 95% CI 0.01- 0.65; p =.020), after adjustment for patients' characteristics. Specialists were more likely to use antiplatelet agents (93% vs 73%, p <.00 1), statins (62% vs 25%, p <.001) and beta blockers (28% vs 3%, p <.001). Survival differences between specialists and GPs disappeared once the use of pharmacotherapies was added to the proportional hazard model. The fully adjusted model showed that the use of statins was significantly associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (RR= 0.02: 95% CI 0.01-0.73, p=.034) and cardiovascular mortality (RR=0.02: 95% Cl 0.01-0.71, p =033). CONCLUSIONS: Specialist management of patients with symptomatic PAD resulted in better survival than generalist management. This effect appears to be mainly caused by the more frequent use of effective medicines by specialists.
ACCESSION #
25056429

 

Related Articles

  • Workload and risk force GP to quit.  // Pulse;5/5/2003, Vol. 63 Issue 18, p8 

    Relates that British physician, Tony Hall-Jones is being forced to quit his general practitioner specialist post because of the workload and legal implications of the new contract for enhanced service providers. Career background; Medical defense subscriptions; Implications for medical practice.

  • Enhanced services could be flashpoint for some practices. Graham, James // Pulse;5/5/2003, Vol. 63 Issue 18, p28 

    Examines the implications of enhanced medical services for the occurrence of partnership disputes among physicians in Great Britain. Provision of enhanced medical services such as minor surgery and treatment of drug misusers; Problems in providing optional services; Implications for medical care.

  • GPs criticise OOH 'hand-backs'  // Pulse;8/16/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 33, p2 

    Reports on complaints by general practitioners that out-of-hours organizations are handing urgent medical cases back to practices rather than dealing with them.

  • What exactly makes you a good GP? Rowe, Dorothy // Pulse;1/26/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 4, p52 

    Discusses what makes general practitioners good at their job. Differentiation between good practitioners and those who are not; Definition of the idea that good general practitioners take interest in people; Requirements for practitioners in understanding their patient.

  • Opt out by September call.  // Pulse;3/22/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 12, p18 

    Shares the argument of Welsh local medical communities that every general practice in Wales should be allowed to opt out of out-of-the hours by the end of September 2004 to ensure new systems can cope in time for winter pressures. Concern of GP that services would be inadequate to cope with...

  • Contract comes under fire.  // Pulse;6/7/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 23, p3 

    Highlights the motions to be brought up by general practitioners in Great Britain in the annual LMC conference in response to a new contract. Deficiency of enhanced services funding; Expected failure of the contract; Ban on the sale of goodwill.

  • MPs warned of crisis in out-of-hours.  // Pulse;6/28/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 26, p1 

    Reports that general practitioners in Great Britain have told a committee of MPs a potential crisis is looming in out-of-hours care because primary care organizations are struggling to set up new services and recruit staff. Feeling of potential crisis over who is going to do the work; Predicted...

  • Double whammy on our pension pockets. Tanner, Colin // Pulse;7/5/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 27, p26 

    Comments on how little has been written about employer's superannuation payments under the General Medical Service contract in Great Britain. Employers' superannuation contribution; Implication that general practitioners are paying the 14 per cent employer's contribution as well as the six per...

  • GPs hit back after report condemns 100 premises. Pedder, Cato // Pulse;10/25/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 42, p7 

    Reports on the response of general practitioners to a government review showing 700 practices in England are unfit for patients. Minimum standards for practices set by the government; Difficulties faced by general practitioners in making capital investments and comply with government requirements.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics