TITLE

Who Designed That?

AUTHOR(S)
McIver, Tom
PUB. DATE
June 2007
SOURCE
Skeptic;2007, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p60
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article shares the author's insights on creationism and intelligent design (ID). The author cites that postulating an evolving designer would eliminate annoying problems for creationists, including the existence of species competition and extinction. He adds that evolution can be accepted with or without belief in God or the Bible, but teaching creationism, including ID creationism demands entanglement of religion with science.
ACCESSION #
25486041

 

Related Articles

  • Design on Trial: How NCSE Helped Win the Kitzmiller Case. Matzke, Nick // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Jan-Apr2006, Vol. 26 Issue 1/2, p37 

    The article focuses on the role of the National Center for Science Education (NCSE) in the case between Kitzmiller v Dover, the first test case on the constitutionality of teaching intelligent design in public schools in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. A major part of the day-to-day work at NCSE...

  • Can I Keep a Witness? Elsberry, Welsey R. // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Jan-Apr2006, Vol. 26 Issue 1/2, p45 

    The article focuses on the withdrawal of expert witnesses in the Kitzmiller v Dover Area School District and McLean v Arkansas cases. Thomas More Law Center (TMLC) has named John Angus Campbell, a professor of rhetoric at the University of Memphis, as an expert witness for the defense in...

  • Creationism Masked in Scientific Lingo.  // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Jan-Apr2006, Vol. 26 Issue 1/2, p46 

    The article focuses on the decision of U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III, declaring unconstitutional the Dover, Pennsylvania, school board's advocacy of intelligent design is not binding on any other jurisdiction. The author discusses the basis of the court's decision. The decision...

  • Scientists and Literalists. Born, Daniel // Common Review;Spring2006, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p4 

    This article comments on the debate between evolutionary theorists and creationists over the narrative of Genesis 1 and 2. It reports on a federal judge's ruling that prohibited the proponents of intelligent design in the Dover, Pennsylvania school district to present their viewpoint in biology...

  • SCIENCE IN WONDERLAND. Wilson, John // Christianity Today;Apr2006, Vol. 50 Issue 4, p74 

    The article focuses on the aspects surrounding the issue of evolution. It emphasizes that students are learning about evolution without abandoning their belief in some form of creationism. It questions the controversy involving Intelligent Design and chirality in elephant hormones. It provides...

  • Religion, Science, and Explanation. Dawes, Gregory W. // Ars Disputandi (AD);2012, Vol. 12, p19 

    A recent legal ruling in the United States regarding 'intelligent design' (ID) argued that ID is not science because it invokes a supernatural agent. It therefore cannot be taught in public schools. But the important philosophical question is not whether ID invokes a supernatural agent; it is...

  • The real dirty secret of academic publishing. Svetlov, Vladimir // Nature;10/21/2004, Vol. 431 Issue 7011, p897 

    Comments on the article about intelligent design, published in the 2004 issue of the periodical "Nature". Suggestion that getting an intelligent-design paper into a peer-reviewed journal is an achievement for creationism; Failure of the article to present new arguments; Rampant proliferation of...

  • California Schemin'. Boston, Rob // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Jul/Aug2006, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p4 

    The article discusses various issues concerning the teaching of creationism in public schools. It sighted several federal court cases striking down creationism in public schools. Kenneth Hurst, together with other parents , won the case when school board of Frazier Mountain High School in Lebec,...

  • Problems with the Intersession Course. Scott, Eugenie C. // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Jul/Aug2006, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p6 

    The article examines the syllabus of the curriculum "Philosophy of Intelligent Design." The author argues that the course aims to disparage the scientific status of evolution and to present the religious ideas of creation science and intelligent design as superior to evolution. He reveals that...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics