TITLE

Supreme Court Upholds Free Speech In FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life

AUTHOR(S)
Andrusko, Dave
PUB. DATE
July 2007
SOURCE
National Right to Life News;Jul2007, Vol. 34 Issue 7, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case, Federal Election Commission versus Wisconsin Right to Life Inc. (WRTL) on June 25, 2007. The Supreme Court has upheld the freedom of speech portion of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform law. A provision of the law prohibits corporations, unions and citizen advocacy groups such as WRTL from using general treasury funds for political campaigns.
ACCESSION #
25930539

 

Related Articles

  • WISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE, INC., APPELLANT v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION: ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life Inc., case number 04-1581, which was decided on January 23, 2006. The petitioner demanded a review of the judgment of the District Court for the District of Columbia. The District Court...

  • The Supreme Court and Freedom of Speech, 2004-2005. Siegel, Paul // Free Speech Yearbook;2005, Vol. 42, p111 

    The article discusses several U.S. Supreme Court cases including Wisconsin Right to Life Inc. v. Federal Election Commission, McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, and Multimedia Holdings Corporation v. Circuit Court of Florida 1624. It gives details of each case and the decisions. The judge...

  • COURTSIDE. Smith, Paul M.; Verrilli, Donald B.; Carpenter, Julie M.; Fallow, Katherine A.; Hellman, Matthew; Block, Joshua // Communications Lawyer;Winter2007, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p27 

    The article focuses on two pending cases in the Supreme Court of the U.S. including Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life Inc. and Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association v. Brentwood Academy. In the former case, the company was planning to run advertisement on...

  • High-Court Hypocrisy. Alter, Jonathan // Newsweek (Atlantic Edition);2/1/2010 (Atlantic Edition), Vol. 155 Issue 5, p17 

    The article offers the author's views on a January 2010 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn election spending limits placed on corporations. The case involving the corporate-backed organization Citizens United and the U.S. Federal Election Commission is discussed. Supreme Court Chief...

  • High-Court Hypocrisy. Alter, Jonathan // Newsweek (Pacific Edition);2/1/2010 (Pacific Edition), Vol. 155 Issue 5, p19 

    The article offers the author's views on a January 2010 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn election spending limits placed on corporations. The case involving the corporate-backed organization Citizens United and the U.S. Federal Election Commission is discussed. Supreme Court Chief...

  • McCutcheon's Supreme Cynicism. Fischer, Brendan // Progressive;Jun2014, Vol. 78 Issue 6, p14 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the McCutcheon v. FEC case over the limit on an individual's direct contribution to political campaign funds. It says that the case was filed by Shaun McCutcheon against the Federal Election Commission (FEC), arguing that preventing him...

  • FEC V. WISCONSIN RIGHT TO…PETITION?: A COMMENT ON FEC V. WISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE. Barday, Shireen A. // Stanford Law Review;Nov2008, Vol. 61 Issue 2, p443 

    The author comments on the case U.S. Federal Election Commission (FEC) v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. (WRTL). She notes that the case is the U.S. Supreme Court's attempt to unravel basic advocacy by nonprofit corporations from the impediment of political broadcast restrictions under the...

  • Wisconsin Right to Life Inc. v. FEC Impact of the Supreme Court Decision.  // Supreme Court Debates;Sep2007, Vol. 10 Issue 6, p10 

    An excerpt from the July 5, 2007 issue of "Congressional Research Service Report" titled "The Constitutionality of Regulating Political Advertisements: An Analysis of Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc." is presented.

  • Is the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act's Limit on "Electioneering Communications" by Corporations and Labor Unions Constitutional?: Pro. Waxman, Seth P. // Supreme Court Debates;Sep2007, Vol. 10 Issue 6, p14 

    An excerpt from the Reply Brief for the Appellants as submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court on February 23, 2007, which deals with the case of Federal Election Commission versus Wisconsin Right to Life Inc., is presented.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics