TITLE

N.Y. county's 'play-or-pay' mandate pre-empted by ERISA, judge rules

AUTHOR(S)
Wojcik, Joanne
PUB. DATE
July 2007
SOURCE
Business Insurance;7/23/2007, Vol. 41 Issue 30, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article reports that a federal court has invalidated the two-year-old Suffolk County, New York, play-or-pay health care mandate that requires certain retailers to provide a prescribed level of health insurance to their nonmanagement workers. The Suffolk County law is pre-empted by the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act, which bars states from legislating the content of employee benefit plans, Judge Arthur Spatt of the U.S. District Court in Central Islip, New York, ruled.
ACCESSION #
26129874

 

Related Articles

  • LEGAL UPDATE.  // Benefits Quarterly;1993 Third Quarter, Vol. 9 Issue 3, p89 

    Cites court cases highlighting updates on legal issues involving employee fringe benefits. Reinstatement of long-term disability benefits where notice of denial was insufficient; Continuation of insurance coverage for a qualified beneficiary; Liability of a plan for erroneous authorization of...

  • Court Allows Cutback and Termination of Retiree Medical Benefits.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Sep2008, Vol. 42 Issue 9, p11 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed a district court's judgment concerning retiree medical benefits that were cut back and terminated. In Nichols et al. v. Alcatel USA, Inc., the four individual plaintiffs and two unions filed the...

  • Shrinking HMO competition bodes ill for employers. Bonura, Chris // New Orleans CityBusiness (1994 to 2008);09/11/2000, Vol. 21 Issue 12, p63 

    Discusses the impact of decreased competition in health maintenance organizations in New Orleans, Louisiana on the cost of health care insurance paid for by employers. Health care expenditures of the business sector; Increased demand for expensive prescription drugs; Disadvantage health care...

  • Treatment on the spot. Tirbutt, Edmund // Employee Benefits;Dec2002, p17 

    Focuses on the trend towards in-house medical treatment and private medical insurance (PMI) as employee fringe benefits. Employer demand resulting in other on-site treatments being covered; Cover for local private general practitioner consultations likely to be popular; Narrowing gap between...

  • ACA upheld, HR's compliance scramble begins.  // HR Specialist: Compensation & Benefits;Aug2012, Vol. 7 Issue 8, p1 

    The article discusses the court case wherein the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Affordability Care Act's (ACA) constitutionality with the mandate requiring Americans to get health insurance coverage by 2014 otherwise they will be penalized. It notes that ACA action will start in 2014 with...

  • No-Fault Ruling Assists in Fraud Fighting in NY.  // Insurance Advocate;4/25/2005, Vol. 116 Issue 9, p11 

    The article focuses on the New York State Court of Appeals decision under which insurance companies may withhold no-fault payments for medical services provided by fraudulently incorporated enterprises to which patients have assigned their claims. According to the New York Insurance Association,...

  • Pilot crashes. Becker, Cinda // Modern Healthcare;4/19/2004, Vol. 34 Issue 16, p6 

    Focuses on the decision of U.S. District Judge John Bissell in Newark, New Jersey to place a permanent injunction on the bonus-payment demonstration project launched in January 2004 by the Center for Measurement of Science and the New Jersey Hospital Association. Lawsuit filed by four hospitals...

  • Canadian court decisions highlight obscure disability benefit rules. Gonzalez, Gloria // Business Insurance;5/29/2006, Vol. 40 Issue 22, p21 

    The article focuses on court decisions which highlight some obscure disability-related liabilities facing Canadian employers as of May 2006. In two cases, courts have held employers responsible for providing disability benefits for an unspecified period after terminating employees, highlighting...

  • CAN YOU DECIDE THE CASE OF THE WOULD-BE MEMBER?  // Labor Law Journal;Apr51, Vol. 2 Issue 4, p278 

    The article presents information about the fact that can one decide the case of the would-be member. In a company which had a Quarter Century Club for old-timers, a man who had completed his twenty-five years of service-with one interruption-wanted to join the club. Membership had other than...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics