TITLE

Eaton v. Brant County Board of Education

AUTHOR(S)
Pothier, Dianne
PUB. DATE
June 2006
SOURCE
Canadian Journal of Women & the Law;2006, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p121
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In Eaton v. Brant County Board of Education, the Women's Court of Canada reverses the 1997 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, which rejected a presumption of integrated education for disabled students. The Women's Court finds that although the Supreme Court did not actually invoke the terminology of "separate but equal," that is the essence of their decision to find no breach of section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms arising from segregated placement. According" to the Women's Court, the Supreme Court's rejection of a presumption of integration amounts to the adoption of a hierarchy of difference, which is inconsistent with the equality guarantee in section 15 of the Charter. The Women's Court finds that a constitutional presumption of integrated education for disabled students is necessary for two reasons. First, such a presumption is required to counteract the historic legacy by which, segregation has connoted inferior status. Second, a constitutional presumption of integration is necessary to place an onus on the state to make the integrated educational environment genuinely inclusive and to meet diverse needs. Such an onus puts the responsibility on the state to demonstrate the specific conditions and circumstances under which an integrated educational setting cannot meet the best interests of disabled students, which is a matter of section 1 justification. In any context in which segregated education is sought to be imposed, section 15 itself demands integrated education. Thus, the Women's Court of Canada concludes that section 15 is breached in the present case. As a result of mootness, however, section 1 is not addressed.
ACCESSION #
28861351

 

Related Articles

  • Litigation privilege: transient or timeless? Blank v Canada (Minister of Justice). Goudkamp, James // International Journal of Evidence & Proof;Dec2007, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p322 

    The article presents an opinion on the Canada Supreme Court's judgment in the case entitled "Blank v. Canada (Minister of Justice)", regarding litigation privilege. The Supreme Court ruled that litigation privilege ends when the proceedings that gave rise to it are completed. The implications of...

  • Law v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration). R�aume, Denise // Canadian Journal of Women & the Law;2006, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p143 

    The judgment of the Women's Court of Canada in Law v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) traces the emergence of dignity as the touchstone of section 15 equality rights, and reviews the factors relevant to finding a violation of dignity from the Supreme Court of Canada's 1999...

  • Standing Apart: Separate Concurrence and the Modern Supreme Court of Canada, 1984-2006. McCormick, Peter // McGill Law Journal;Spring2008, Vol. 53 Issue 1, p137 

    The article focuses on the Modern Supreme Court of Canada, and separate concurrences as a common feature of common law court decisions. From the results of the analysis of the use of separate concurrences by the Supreme Court of Canada under Chief Justices Dickson, Lamer and McLachlin, the...

  • Sommes-nous dignes? L'égalité et l'arrêt Gosselin. Jackman, Martha // Canadian Journal of Women & the Law;2005, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p161 

    The author examines the Supreme Court of Canada's judgment in Gosselin v. Quebec (Attorney General) and considers to what extent this decision represents a step backwards for women's equality in the poverty context. She concludes that the Gosselin case demonstrates yet again that the feminist...

  • WHAT HAS DUNSMUIR TAUGHT? WOOLLEY, ALICE; FLUKER, SHAUN // Alberta Law Review;Jun2010, Vol. 47 Issue 4, p1017 

    This article discusses the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in a case about how courts should review decisions of administrative tribunals. It looks at trends in the identification of the standard of review, including the reliance of the Alberta Court of Appeal on the pragmatic and...

  • The Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in Fraser: Stepping Forward, Backward or Sideways? Barrett, Steven // Canadian Labour & Employment Law Journal;2012, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p331 

    The article focuses on the doctrinal practices and the ramifications with respect to the decision of the Supreme Court of the country on the court case Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser and Health Services and Support-Facilities Subsector Bargaining Ass'n v. British Columbia. The cases were...

  • The Effect of Pre-Legislative Consultation after Fraser. MacDonald, Diane // Canadian Labour & Employment Law Journal;2012, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p375 

    The article presents information on the right to collective bargaining with respect to the decision of the Supreme Court of the country on the court cases Health Services and Support-Facilities Subsector Bargaining Ass'n v. British Columbia and Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser. The decision...

  • The Wal-Mart Case: Supreme Court Ruling Upholds Employers' Right to Close Their Businesses. Beauregard, Sébastien // Shopping Center Legal Update;Spring2010, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p27 

    The article reports on the decision of the Canadian Supreme Court regarding the right of Wal-Mart Canada Corp. to close their business in the country. It notes that on Nov. 27, 2009, the Supreme Court of Canada handed down a judgment in Gaétan Plourde v. Wal-Mart Canada Corp. The ruling...

  • Bench Press.  // LawNow;Nov/Dec2012, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p6 

    The article discusses several court cases in Canada. It states that the Supreme Court has granted an order sought by a 15-year-old girl in Nova Scotia that has given her an anonymity. An individual and a society were granted public standing by the Supreme Court. The decision of Justice June Ross...

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics