TITLE

Marriage Watch

PUB. DATE
May 2008
SOURCE
DaKine;May2008, Issue 113, p10
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the rulings of the Supreme Court regarding the legality of same-sex marriage in California. The state law is requiring the Court to render a decision within 90 days of hearing arguments on same-sex marriage in which decision is expected by the end of the first week in June 2008. On the other hand, lawmakers begun to write a bill that will legitimize gay marriage which is planned to introduce in 2009.
ACCESSION #
31871951

 

Related Articles

  • 'Suspect' Judgment. Keefe, Derek R. // Christianity Today;Jul2008, Vol. 52 Issue 7, p18 

    The article focuses on the implications of the decision of the California Supreme Court to overturn a state law prohibiting same-sex marriages on May 15, 2008, stating that sexual orientation was a suspect classification. It is explained that by labeling sexual orientation suspect, the court...

  • Gay Marriage by Judicial Decree. Taylor Jr., Stuart // National Journal;5/24/2008, Vol. 40 Issue 20, p9 

    In this article, the author expresses his opinion on a decision by the California Supreme Court ordering the state to stop calling committed gay couples domestic partners and start calling them married. According to the author, he is happy for the many gays who rejoiced at the court's decision....

  • The Recent California Decision Overruling the Ban on Same-Sex Marriages and its Effect on Employee Benefit Plans.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2008 Q2, Special section p1 

    This article deals with the implication of a California Supreme Court's decision to overrule the ban on same-sex marriages for employee benefit plans. Pension plans, 401(k) plans and cafeteria plans are examples of employee benefit plans governed by federal law. Particular focus is given to the...

  • Gay Marriage Roadblocks. Eckstrom, Kevin // Christianity Today;Oct2004, Vol. 48 Issue 10, p19 

    Reports on the move by the California's Supreme Court to nullify the marriages of gay couples in San Francisco, California. Ruling by the court that marriage licenses issued by Mayor Gavin Newsom from February 12 to March 11, 2004 are void and of no legal effect; Concerns on the...

  • guest opinion. Monroe, Irene // Bay Windows;5/28/2009, Vol. 27 Issue 24, p7 

    The article presents the author's comments on the ruling of California Supreme Court against same-sex marriage, on May 26, 2009.

  • Calif. Court Weighs Prop 8. KEEN, LISA // Windy City Times;3/11/2009, Vol. 24 Issue 24, p1 

    The article reports on a hearing on whether to overturn Proposition 8, a constitutional amendment passed in November 2008 to ban same-sex marriage, held by the California Supreme Court in San Francisco on March 5, 2009.

  • Proposition 8 sponsors seek to nullify same-sex marriages.  // Gay & Lesbian Times;12/24/2008, Issue 1096, p14 

    The article reports on the Proposition 8 sponsors who requested the California Supreme Court to nullify the same-sex marriages.

  • on the record.  // Gay & Lesbian Times;12/28/2006, Issue 992, p24 

    The article presents a quote spoken by Diane Olsen after the California Supreme Court unanimously agreed to decide the constitutionality of same-sex marriage exclusion on December 20, 2006. Olsen satirically spoke on the separation and inequality of domestic partnership laws in the state. Olsen...

  • Republican legislator to introduce anti-gay bill.  // Gay & Lesbian Times;12/18/2003, Issue 834, p26 

    Republican legislator Robert G. Marshall of Richmond, Virginia said he will introduce a bill in the upcoming General Assembly election that would prevent Virginia from recognizing civil unions between gay couples from other states. Marshall said Virginia has a law that bans the recognition of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics