TITLE

RETHINKING THE ROLE OF THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS

AUTHOR(S)
Mulqueen, Matthew S.
PUB. DATE
June 2008
SOURCE
St. John's Law Review;Summer2008, Vol. 82 Issue 3, p1157
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article examines the history of exclusionary rule, including the dual reasoning behind the judicially created deterrent and its application in deportation proceedings. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in INS v. Lopez-Mendoza is discussed. Two significant and interrelated changes to the immigration landscape has occurred since the decision, including the criminalization of immigration law and the increasing involvement of state and local officials in immigration enforcement. The article also presents an analysis of the exclusionary rule's deterrence benefits and social costs in light of the current state of immigration.
ACCESSION #
32848754

 

Related Articles

  • From Plyler to Arizona: Have the Courts Forgotten about Corfield v Coryell? Eastman, John C. // University of Chicago Law Review;Winter2013, Vol. 80 Issue 1, p165 

    The article reflects on the efficacy of the institutions that adopt and enforce immigration laws in the U.S. It tries to find out answer to the question that which institution will best give effect to the policy judgment regarding enforcement of immigration laws. It cites reference of the U.S....

  • Court May Take Up Health Care, Immigration. Ichniowski, Tom; Russel, Pam Radtke; Hunter, Pam // ENR: Engineering News-Record;10/17/2011, Vol. 267 Issue 11, p9 

    The article reports that the construction industry will monitor the rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court on healthcare and immigration cases. The Department of Justice has petitioned to reverse the court's ruling regarding the constitutionality of the provisions of 2010 Patient Protection and...

  • Supreme Court Upholds Key Part of Controversial Arizona Immgration Law. GANDELMAN, JOE // Moderate Voice;6/25/2012, p10 

    The article reports on the U.S. Supreme Court ruling concerning the immigration law in Arizona. It states that while most of the new immigration law of Arizona were rejected by the Supreme Court, there is a part which was upheld. It adds that the right of the police to check the status of the...

  • The Court's Stand for Federalism. ROBINSON, EUGENE // Moderate Voice;6/25/2012, p11 

    The article reports on the stand of the U.S. Supreme Court concerning the immigration law of Arizona. It says that the right of the police to check the status of the detained people's immigration was upheld by the Supreme Court in the immigration law. Moreover, the court said that it is too...

  • Suppressing Evidence in Immigration Proceedings: The Need for a Lenient Egregiousness Standard and Rebellious Lawyering. Devine, Mikaela A. // Minnesota Law Review;2014, Vol. 99 Issue 1, p313 

    The article discusses the suppression of evidence in U.S. immigration law proceedings, focusing on the author's claim that America needs a lenient egregiousness standard and rebellious lawyering. Violations of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution are mentioned, along with motions to...

  • SEARCH AND SEIZURE.  // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Dec1975, Vol. 66 Issue 4, p436 

    This article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court decision on four fourth amendment cases dealing with stops and searches by immigration authorities near, but not directly at, the U.S. border. Continuing an approach taken two years earlier in 1973, the Court's decision in United States versus Ortiz...

  • Tracking Washington.  // MondayMorning;6/25/2012, Vol. 20 Issue 25, p1 

    The article informs that the U.S. Supreme Court may take an extra day for its decision related to U.S. President Barack Obama's healthcare law and Arizona's immigration law. It adds that it is the Chief Justice's practice on the next-to-last day of the term to announce that the following session...

  • Some Hope For Aliens.  // America;7/16/2001-7/23/2001, Vol. 185 Issue 2, p3 

    Editorial. Comments on the decision of the United States (U.S.) Supreme Court on the two cases involving the deportation and detention of aliens in the country. Statutes enacted by the U.S. Congress that increased the complexity of the country's immigration law; Analysis on the voting records...

  • Immigration: not a black-and-white issue. Taylor, Greg // Indianapolis Business Journal;7/16/2012 Supplement, Vol. 33, p8 

    The article reports that the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the Arizona immigration law draws an attention to the pending challenges in Indiana's constitutional law, which is a question to be answered by the courts.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics