TITLE

THE THEORY DEBATE IN PSYCHOLOGY

AUTHOR(S)
Burgos, Jos� E.
PUB. DATE
February 2007
SOURCE
Behavior & Philosophy;2007, Vol. 35, p149
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This paper is a conceptual analysis of the theory debate in psychology, as carried out by cognitivists and radical behaviorists. The debate has focused on the necessity of theories in psychology. However, the logically primary issue is the nature of theories, or what theories are. This claim stems from the fact that cognitivists and radical behaviorists adopt disparate accounts of the nature of theories. The cognitivists' account is closely akin to the received view from logical positivism, where theories are collections of statements and theoretical terms are restricted to designate unobservable entities. Radical behaviorists also conceive theories as collections of statements, but restrict theoretical terms in psychology to designate observable entities. If each side approaches the necessity issue with its preferred account, both agree that theories are necessary in psychology. Hence, there is no disagreement over the necessity of theories in psychology per se, only over the nature of theories. The received view, however, has been shown to suffer from irreparable difficulties that have led to its total rejection in post-positivistic philosophy of science. Alternative accounts, like the structuralist and semantic views, do not raise the issue of whether theories are necessary in psychology.
ACCESSION #
33337468

 

Related Articles

  • physicalism Philosophy.  // Dictionary of Theories;2002, p412 

    A definition of the term "physicalism," is presented. It is a term used in philosophy which states that all scientific statements could be reduced to statements about ordinary physical objects. Currently, it is most often used for the identity theory of mind, sometimes including behaviorism.

  • Conceivability, Higher Order Patterns, and Physicalism. Jacobson-Horowitz, Hilla; Horowitz, Amir // Acta Analytica;Winter2008, Vol. 23 Issue 4, p349 

    The article shows that the arguments that zombies and zombie worlds are conceivable and possible, are unsound and argues that the assumption that phenomenal properties are necessitated by physical properties does not imply that one cannot conceive of the former without the latter. According to...

  • PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, WITH SPECIAL CONSIDERATION GIVEN TO BEHAVIORISM AS THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE SCIENCE OF BEHAVIOR. Moore, J. // Psychological Record;Winter2010, Vol. 60 Issue 1, p137 

    The philosophy of science is the branch of philosophy that critically examines the foundations, assumptions, methods, products, and implications of the activity called science. The present sketch reviews the historical development of the philosophy of science, representative individuals in the...

  • Physicalism, Behaviorism and Incompleteness. Tao Li // Asian Social Science;May2011, Vol. 7 Issue 5, p203 

    The content of this paper contains four parts. (1) First, physicalism gives the enlightenments to behaviorism: mind-body identity, objectivity like physics and completeness of reduction. (2) Secondly, there are difficulties which behaviorist could not overcome-both the reduction of the theory...

  • Mental Causation and Shoemaker-Realization. Brian McLaughlin // Erkenntnis;Sep2007, Vol. 67 Issue 2, p149 

    Abstract  Sydney Shoemaker has proposed a new definition of `realization’ and used it to try to explain how mental events can be causes within the framework of a non-reductive physicalism. I argue that it is not actually his notion of realization that is doing the...

  • logical empiricism Philosophy.  // Dictionary of Theories;2002, p319 

    A definition of the term "logical empiricism" is presented. It refers to the version of empiricism that applies to the meanings of words or sentences, whereby they have meaning only if there are rules involving sense-experience for applying or verifying them.

  • LUDICS, DIALOGUE AND INFERENTIALISM. LECOMTE, ALAIN // Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic & Communicatio;Nov2013, Vol. 8, p1 

    In this paper, we try to show that Ludics, a (pre-) logical framework invented by J-Y. Girard, enables us to rethink some of the relationships between Philosophy, Semantics and Pragmatics. In particular, Ludics helps to shed light on the nature of dialogue and to articulate features of Brandom's...

  • PHYSICALISM COULD BE TRUE EVEN IF MARY LEARNS SOMETHING NEW. Montero, Barbara // Philosophical Quarterly;Apr2007, Vol. 57 Issue 227, p176 

    Mary knows all there is to know about physics, chemistry and neurophysiology, yet has never experienced colour. Most philosophers think that if Mary learns something genuinely new upon seeing colour for the first time, then physicalism is false. I argue, however, that physicalism is consistent...

  • The Overdetermination Argument Revisited. Vicente, Agustín // Minds & Machines;Aug2004, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p331 

    In this paper I discuss a famous argument for physic alism - which some authors indeed regard as the only argument for it - the "overdetermination argument". In fact it is an argument that does not establish that all the entities in the world are physical, but that all those events that enter...

Share

Other Topics