TITLE

The Economic Implications of Proposed Changes in the Accounting for Nuclear Decommissioning Costs

AUTHOR(S)
Boatsman, James R.; Khurana, Inder K.; Loudder, Martha L.
PUB. DATE
June 2000
SOURCE
Accounting Horizons;Jun2000, Vol. 14 Issue 2, p211
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This paper analyzes the accounting effects of the proposed standard Accounting for Obligations Associated with the Retirement of Long-Lived Assets, and considers the economic effects of accounting data in electric utility rate-making. Specifically, we model the financial statement with respect to nuclear decommissioning costs and posit several likely scenarios for the economic implications for the affected firms, their electric consumers, and the rate regulators. The model reveals that the sign of the equity adjustment at adoption and the change in ongoing expense will depend on (1) the age of the plant, and (2) the ratio of the current cost estimate used to compute depreciation under the current practice and the estimated future decommissioning cost. When the model is applied to firms with nuclear plants, we find that the financial statement effects at adoption will be substantial for many firms, and that the ongoing effects of the standard will be to increase the reported expenses of decommissioning substantially. These findings are of interest for three reasons: first, contrary to our data, many of the firms analyzed have stated in their annual reports that the adoption effects of the proposed standard will be immaterial; second, the standard may have a deleterious effect on established regulatory rate-making relationships by changing the basis for consumer rates; and third, the analysis suggests that some firms will be faced with either requesting rate increases or jeopardizing their eligibility for special regulatory accounting treatment. Any of these outcomes create potentially severe problems in an industry on the brink of monumental economic and structural change, that is, the transition from a regulated monopoly to competition.
ACCESSION #
3358107

 

Related Articles

  • Impairment Write-Offs: Truth or Manipulation? Baker, Paul D. // National Public Accountant;Jul2000, Vol. 45 Issue 5, p36 

    Examines the Standard Number 121 (SFAS 121), an accounting criteria in the United States in determining whether impairments of long-lived assets had occurred and how to measure and report them. Controversy surrounding asset impairments; SFAS 121 requirements; Impact of SFAS 121 on valuation and...

  • Accounting solutions.  // Accountancy;Jan2006, Vol. 137 Issue 1349, p94 

    The article discusses several issues related to financial reporting. The application of the revaluation model for buildings under the International Accounting Standard 16 is explained. The recognition criteria for an intangible asset is described. The voting power given to warrant holder is also...

  • United Kingdom : RWE decommissions further power stations.  // TendersInfo News;8/14/2014, p1 

    The article reports on additional power plants decommissioned by RWE, which comes after low demand for electricity due to mild winter and the resulting low demand for heating. Topics discussed include a comparison of its financial standing during the same time in 2013, the planned...

  • For your benefit. Carter, Jenny // Accountancy;Jun2003, Vol. 131 Issue 1318, p94 

    The article explains how the Accounting Standards Board (ASB) proposes to interpret its principles so as to apply them to not-for-profits organizations in Great Britain. Two of the key elements of the financial statements where further explanation is required are assets and liabilities. In...

  • GASB's Fund Balance Reporting Project. Loyd, D. Scot; Crawford, Michael A. // Miller Governmental GAAP Update Service;10/30/2005, Vol. 5 Issue 20, p1 

    The article presents information about the Governmental Accounting Standards Board's (GASB) Fund Balance Reporting Project in the U.S. The restricted net assets and fund balance reporting projects originated after the completion of the financial reporting model project and the issuance of GASB...

  • CHAPTER 2: FINANCIAL RETURNS: ASSET STRUCTURE RATIOS. Parker, Philip M. // Egypt Economic Competitiveness;Feb2006, p12 

    In this chapter we consider the asset structure of companies operating in Egypt benchmarked against global averages. The chapter begins by defining relevant terms. A common-size statement, or vertical analysis of assets is then presented for companies operating in Egypt and the average global...

  • Offsetting of Assets and Liabilities.  // California CPA;Mar/Apr2013, Vol. 81 Issue 8, p6 

    The article reports that the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an Accounting Standards Update for Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies scope of transactions subject to disclosures about offsetting.

  • An Evaluation and Critique of the Changes Provided by Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 6. Sanborn, Robert H. // Accounting Horizons;Sep87, Vol. 1 Issue 3, p41 

    This article focuses on the Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts (SFAC) Number 6 Elements of Financial Statements issued by the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in December 1985. SFAC Number 6 expands SFAC Number 3 to include terminology that applies to nonbusiness...

  • STRAIGHT-LINE METHOD OF DEPRECIATION. Campbell, J. D. // Accounting Review;Jan1951, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p40 

    A great deal of controversy has taken place recently covering the field of depreciation and the acceptable method to be applied in the allocation of the expenditure of fixed assets to revenue. Every accountant knows that the straight-line method is not used in order to give the true depreciation...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics