TITLE

What's Good for the Goose and Related Matters

AUTHOR(S)
Parrish, Stephen E.
PUB. DATE
March 2008
SOURCE
Journal of Ayn Rand Studies (Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Foundat;Spring2008, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p395
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents the author's response on the article "Not Even False: A Commentary on Parrish and Toner," by Adam Reed. The title of this paper implies that his attempt, together with his colleague, Patrick Toner, to restate the Objectivist position in Philosophy of Religion do not rise to the level of being false. Reed's paper ignores most of the issues that the author has discussed to his paper. The author says that Reed's arguments about arbitrary concepts do not meet his original criticisms and the points he made against theistic arguments are fallacious.
ACCESSION #
33719058

 

Related Articles

  • Not Even False: A Commentary on Parrish and Toner. Reed, Adam // Journal of Ayn Rand Studies (Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Foundat;Spring2008, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p361 

    The author comments on two papers about God and Objectivism by Patric Toner and Stephen E. Parrish. Toner misreads several comments by Objectivist scholars about objectivism's direct objection to the concept of a god, thus, responding to Toner requires a systematic exposition of an objective...

  • God-Talk and the Arbitrary. Toner, Patrick // Journal of Ayn Rand Studies (Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Foundat;Spring2008, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p417 

    The article presents the author's response on Adam Reed's claim that he misunderstands the Objectivist argument against God. This claim is demonstrably false as an extended thought experiment was used to show that the Objectivist case against God is insufficient. Reed's consideration of his...

  • A priori refutations of disagreement arguments against moral objectivity: Why experience matters. Gowans, Christopher // Journal of Value Inquiry;Jun2004, Vol. 38 Issue 2, p141 

    The article discusses the issue regarding the existence of conflicts regarding the philosophical views on moral objectivity. It focuses on the occurrence of the disagreement argument due to various moral standards and objectivity of different societies. It also notes how skeptics maintained...

  • Blind Man’s Bluff: The Basic Belief Apologetic as Anti-skeptical Stratagem. Axtell, Guy // Philosophical Studies;Jul2006, Vol. 130 Issue 1, p131 

    Today we find philosophical naturalists and Christian theists both expressing an interest in virtue epistemology, while starting out from vastly different assumptions. What can be done to increase fruitful dialogue among these divergent groups of virtue-theoretic thinkers? The primary aim of...

  • PHILOSOPHER AND DISPASSIONATE SCIENTIST. Stawarska, Beata // Dialogue & Universalism;2005, Vol. 15 Issue 1/2, p59 

    Philosophia means love of wisdom. If the way of access to wisdom is love, then the quest for wisdom does not appear as a purely cognitive enterprise but also and primarily as an affective one. Rather than reducing the one who searches for wisdom to a pure contemplative mind, it engages the...

  • Skeptical theism and the problem of moral aporia. Piper, Mark // International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Oct2007, Vol. 62 Issue 2, p65 

    Skeptical theism seeks to defend theism against the problem of evil by invoking putatively reasonable skepticism concerning human epistemic limitations in order to establish that we have no epistemological basis from which to judge that apparently gratuitous evils are not in fact justified by...

  • The Prospects for Objectivity in Risk Assessment. Rossi, John // Journal of Value Inquiry;Jun2012, Vol. 46 Issue 2, p237 

    The article describes some aspects of objectivity in risk analysis or assessment. It discusses the significant role played by risk as an inherently evaluative concept. It also explores the requirement of risk objectivity and discusses the objectivity of both deterministic moral judgments and...

  • AN ALTERNATIVE ACCOUNT OF EPISTEMIC REASONS FOR ACTION: IN RESPONSE TO BOOTH. Rowbottom, Darrell Patrick // Grazer Philosophische Studien;2008, Vol. 76 Issue 1, p191 

    In a recent contribution to Grazer Philosophische Studien, Booth argues that for S to have an epistemic reason to Ψ means that if Ψ's then he will have more true beliefs and less false beliefs than if he does not Ψ. After strengthening this external account in response to the objection...

  • Objectivism and Christianity. Dent, Eric B. // Journal of Ayn Rand Studies (Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Foundat;Dec2011, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p189 

    In this article, the author presents his views on two primary philosophies, Objectivism and Christianity. He mentions that both are primary philosophies in Western society upholding an objective reality which means both of them can learn a lot from each other. The author further analyzes that...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics