TITLE

SOFT MONEY, HARD MONEY, STRONG PARTIES

AUTHOR(S)
Ansolabehere, Stephen; Snyder Jr., James M.
PUB. DATE
April 2000
SOURCE
Columbia Law Review;Apr2000, Vol. 100 Issue 3, p598
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Examines the consequences of implementing campaign finance regulation in the United States. Importance of campaign funds; Contrast of campaign funds resources between political parties and candidates; Claims on campaign funds and party discipline in national politics; Use of campaign funds at the state level.
ACCESSION #
3381632

 

Related Articles

  • Restraining Arizona. Sullum, Jacob // Reason;Oct2010, Vol. 42 Issue 5, p13 

    The article focuses on the laws related to public funding restrictions of political candidates in the state elections of Arizona and its impact on the freedom of speech.

  • A CASE OF NOBLE INTENTIONS BUT BIZARRE EFFECTS? Taylor Jr., Stuart // National Journal;3/2/2002, Vol. 34 Issue 9, p591 

    Examines the implications of the McCain-Feingold-Shays-Meehan bill for special interests, lobbyists and campaign consultants in the U.S. Maximum amount of individual contribution to congressional candidates; Benefit of the bill; Significance of a 1976 Supreme Court ruling on campaign contributions.

  • Campaign Finance Re-Reform: The Regulation of Independent Political Committees.  // California Law Review;Mar1983, Vol. 71 Issue 2, p673 

    Argues that the growth of independent political committees threatens to create the appearance and reality of improper commitments by candidates to independent spenders. Problems that accompany independent political committees; Framework supporting campaign finance laws in the U.S.; Discussion...

  • Build an Audience For the Debates.  // Business News New Jersey;9/11/2001, Vol. 14 Issue 37, p18 

    Comments on the provision of funds to gubernatorial candidates for campaigns in New Jersey. Development of advertising programs for the airing of debates; Collaboration between Eagleton Institute and New Jersey Press Association; Deduction of state from campaign fund prior to reimbursements.

  • State's lack of limits on contributions to pols hurts business. Ranney, George // Crain's Chicago Business;10/12/2009, Vol. 32 Issue 41, p16 

    In this article the author reflects upon the lack of restrictions on contributions to political candidates and their campaigns in Chicago, Illinois. He criticizes the state's lack of limits on the contributions, and discusses its negative impact on the businesses and economy which include...

  • A Limit to Campaign Funding--II: A Laudable Reform. Reese, Thomas J. // America;4/14/1979, Vol. 140 Issue 14, p308 

    The author reflects on limiting campaign funding for candidates in 1979. He asserts that the problem with campaign contributions is that their sources are from people that will want something in return from the candidate. He argues that restricting individual campaign contributions would be more...

  • Bidding Starts at 300,000. Light, Paul C. // Government Executive;Jun99, Vol. 31 Issue 6, p14 

    Discusses the emerging bidding war among candidates in both political parties in the United States (US) as the year 2000 presidential campaign starts. Number of civilian jobs that the US Department of Defense plans to cut; Impact of the budget cuts on US Vice President Al Gore's campaign;...

  • More Than Survive, Parties Thrive Under New Campaign Finance Rules. Hadfield, Joe // Campaigns & Elections (1996);Apr2005, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p22 

    Focuses on the effects of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) on the campaign finance of political parties and candidates during the 2004 U.S. presidential election. Results of an investigation of presidential campaigns in six states conducted by the Center for the Study of Elections and...

  • Election Law Miscellany: Enforcement, Access to Debates, Qualification of Initiatives. Lowenstein, Daniel H. // Texas Law Review;Jun99, Vol. 77 Issue 7, p2001 

    Analyzes several political campaign issues in the United States. Cost of accessing ballots for initiatives; Disagreement to the contention that the exclusion of minor parties in political debates in a two-party system of government violates the democratic process; Analysis of the approaches to...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics