Robust clinical governance is key

Chambers, Ruth
September 2008
GP: General Practitioner;9/5/2008, p44
The article discusses the need to review the clinical governance of medical practice. It advices that it is the time for general practitioners to put the practice through a rigorous review of clinical governance. It emphasizes that clinical governance should be the focus to the practice team's ability to continuous improving the quality of services and to safeguard high standards of care.


Related Articles

  • No sex please, we prefer intercourse.  // Pulse;11/15/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 45, p1 

    Focuses on a study which claims that general practitioners can improve patient satisfaction during consultations by using the patients own words for sex, body parts and body functions. Remark of the author of the study, Jane Ogden, a reader in health psychology at King's College London, England,...

  • 'Do asthma reviews by phone'  // Pulse;1/29/2005, Vol. 65 Issue 4, p14 

    Reports on the benefits gained by general practitioners in carrying out asthma consultations through telephone in Great Britain. Possibility for physicians to meet quality targets for reviewing their patients annually; Performance of cost analysis on telephone consultation; Expression of patient...

  • GPs face six-monthly performance checks. Iacobucci, Gareth // Pulse;2/4/2009, Vol. 69 Issue 3, p1 

    The article reports on the biannual contractual reviews and measures among general practitioners (GPs) in Great Britain. The government has decided to implement such rules to intensify its commitment in assuring high quality medical care. The performance reviews are specifically intended to...

  • VIEWPOINT.  // GP: General Practitioner;4/17/2009, p9 

    The author provides information on an inquiry launched by The King's Fund concerning the quality of general practice in England. The panel, comprising of four general practitioners, a senior nurse, and the chairmen of the Royal College of General Practitioners and the National Health Service...

  • Quality of general practice inquiry. Elledge, Jonn // GP: General Practitioner;4/17/2009, p9 

    The article reports on the launching of an 18-month inquiry into the quality of general practice in Great Britain. This investigation will administer by the panel which comprises of four general practitioners, a senior nurse, and the chairmen of the Royal College of General Practitioners and the...

  • Co-ops risk closure in PCT funding crisis. Bostock, Nick // GP: General Practitioner;2/18/2005, p9 

    The article reports that the future of at least half of Great Britain's out-of-hours co-operatives is on "a knife-edge." According to the National Association of General Practitioners Co-operatives (NAGPC), funding shortfalls will force many to compromise quality of care or shut down. NAGPC...

  • Workload and risk force GP to quit.  // Pulse;5/5/2003, Vol. 63 Issue 18, p8 

    Relates that British physician, Tony Hall-Jones is being forced to quit his general practitioner specialist post because of the workload and legal implications of the new contract for enhanced service providers. Career background; Medical defense subscriptions; Implications for medical practice.

  • Enhanced services could be flashpoint for some practices. Graham, James // Pulse;5/5/2003, Vol. 63 Issue 18, p28 

    Examines the implications of enhanced medical services for the occurrence of partnership disputes among physicians in Great Britain. Provision of enhanced medical services such as minor surgery and treatment of drug misusers; Problems in providing optional services; Implications for medical care.

  • GPs criticise OOH 'hand-backs'  // Pulse;8/16/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 33, p2 

    Reports on complaints by general practitioners that out-of-hours organizations are handing urgent medical cases back to practices rather than dealing with them.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics