TITLE

House OKs Pryor Bill

AUTHOR(S)
Hearn, Ted
PUB. DATE
October 2008
SOURCE
Multichannel News;10/13/2008, Vol. 29 Issue 40, p46
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses a bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives that requires the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to examine the access of parents to advanced technologies that can block content on the television and the Internet. The article also discusses the role of the FCC and whether it violates censorship and First Amendment laws.
ACCESSION #
34965000

 

Related Articles

  • FCC Rulings Leave Much Unresolved.  // Television Week;3/27/2006, Vol. 25 Issue 13, p16 

    The article reflects on the need for the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to give broadcasters better guidelines about indecency. The FCC has handed down its first indecency rulings under the reign of chairman Kevin Martin which make policy through enforcement actions rather than...

  • FCC takes hit on indecency. Boliek, Brooks // Hollywood Reporter -- International Edition;6/5/2007, Vol. 399 Issue 44, p1 

    The article reports that an indecency ruling by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission has been declared capricious by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in New York. According to the ruling, broadcasters are liable to be fined for indecency caused due to a slip of tongue. The commission gave...

  • WEARY CENSORS WORRY. Triplett, William // Variety;11/27/2006, Vol. 405 Issue 2, p4 

    The article discusses censorship of television shows. Television networks' Standards & Practices Departments are constantly on edge about the Federal Communication Commissions' reaction to program content, which can often result in huge fines. The system is flawed in that FCC guidelines are...

  • FCC to cable biz: Censor yourself. Sweeting, Paul; Martin, Denise // Daily Variety;4/6/2005, Vol. 287 Issue 3, p1 

    Reports on U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chairman Kevin Martin's call for cable television operators to regulate themselves in order to avoid greater indecency regulation. Speech delivered at the 2005 National Cable Show; Power of the FCC to react to complaints it receives from...

  • Violence censor chip. L.J. // Science World;5/03/96, Vol. 52 Issue 14, p4 

    Reports on the approval of a law by President Bill Clinton, that will decrease the amount of violence children watch on television (TV). Required installation of a V-chip in new TV sets by makers; How this chip will decrease violent shows; Comment from Jim Farrell, of Motorola; How the chip...

  • Fox Challenges Indecency Fine. Halonen, Doug // Television Week;12/6/2004, Vol. 23 Issue 49, p3 

    The article reports that Fox Broadcasting Co. and the majority of the network's affiliates challenged a $1.183 million U.S. Federal Communications Commission indecency fine. The network said that the agency's action violates the First Amendment. The agency imposed a $7,000 fine on each of the...

  • Who's Afraid of the FCC?  // Back Stage East;4/6/2006, Vol. 47 Issue 14, p4 

    The article presents information on the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's TV censorship agenda. With the government's role in policing what should be presented on TV continuing to increase, it was only a matter of time before the self-censorship began. The Warner Bros. Inc., has became...

  • FCC Hacks Away at V-Chip. Eggerton, John // Broadcasting & Cable;12/12/2006, Vol. 136 Issue 49, p16 

    This article discusses the ineffectiveness of the V-chip at protecting children from indecency on television. The United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) lawyers say that the commission itself needs to play a role in helping parents. Major networks Fox, CBS, ABC, and NBC challenge...

  • H--I to the Chief. Eggerton, John // Broadcasting & Cable;7/24/2006, Vol. 136 Issue 29, p10 

    The article reports on the arguments raised by television networks regarding their decision to bleep U.S. President George Bush's profanity. The move of ABC, NBC and CBS to bleep the expletive statement of the president raised questions on whether they did it because of possible sanctions from...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics