TITLE

More Justice to Come?

AUTHOR(S)
Hallworth, Gerald L.
PUB. DATE
April 1970
SOURCE
America;4/11/1970, Vol. 122 Issue 14, p390
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the guilty plea application on the case of Boykin v. Alabama. It suggests that a more reasoned approach to the use of guilty plea will arise in the criminal justice administration in America. It mentions that four members of the court were dismayed with the failure of the plea-receiving judge to examine the contexts around the guilty plea on the case. It adds that elementary protections in a case will fail if the past court decisions will be the bases.
ACCESSION #
35957146

 

Related Articles

  • Litigation by the Numbers.  // InsideCounsel;Jan2014, Vol. 24 Issue 265, p35 

    Statistics are presented related to litigation issues in the U.S. including the increasing numbers of suits in a company, annual total cost of civil justice system and the most frequent source of suits in the workplace.

  • SIXTH AMENDMENT--DISPARATE SENTENCING.  // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Winter1979, Vol. 70 Issue 4, p474 

    The article discusses the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Corbitt versus New Jersey case. Corbitt versus New Jersey is the latest in a line of decisions dividing the Supreme Court on the issue of defendants' constitutional rights under disparate sentencing procedures for guilty pleas...

  • PLEAS, PLAIN LANGUAGE AND PRECEDENT: APPLICABILITY OF RULES 11(F) AND 31(E) TO CRIMINAL FORFEITURE PROVISIONS. Crawford, Angela // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Spring97, Vol. 87 Issue 3, p812 

    This article focuses on the Supreme Court observations regarding applicability of rules 11(f) and 31(e) to criminal forfeiture provisions in the case United States v. Libretti. The Court further observed that the factual basis requirement of Rule 11(f) of the Federal rules of Criminal procedure...

  • At Press Time.  // Investment Management Weekly;2/23/2004, Vol. 17 Issue 8, p1 

    Presents information on the decision Jeffrey Skilling, former chief executive of Enron, to enter a not guilty plea for charges filed against him in a federal court in the U.S. Amount of bail issued for the release of Skilling; Details of the charges filed against Skilling; Penalties for...

  • Former Ensign aide pleads not guilty in 'revolving door' case. Siegelbaum, Debbie // Hill;4/5/2011, Vol. 18 Issue 45, p4 

    The article reports on the guilty plea of Doug Hampton, a former aide to retiring Nevada Senator John Ensign, on seven counts of violating criminal conflict-of-interest laws in 2011.

  • Mass. Cable Vandal Takes Plea. Halgsted, Linda // Multichannel News;7/25/2005, Vol. 26 Issue 30, p22 

    Reports that Danny M. Kelly, suspect for extortion of cable and phone lines in Boston, Massachusetts, has agreed to plead guilty in return for a lighter sentence. Background of the case; Role of unemployment and discrimination in the case; Information on court sentence and restitution to the case.

  • Former BDO Vice Chairman Enter Guilty Plea.  // Public Accounting Report;6/15/2009, Vol. 33 Issue 11, p4 

    The article reports on the guilty plea of former Banco de Oro Vice Chairman Charles Bee in federal court. It states that he pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy, one count of tax evasion and one count of perjury. On each of the counts, he faces a maximum sentence of five-year imprisonment...

  • in brief.  // Commercial Carrier Journal;Jan2008, Vol. 165 Issue 1, p36 

    This section offers news briefs in the U.S. The Supreme Court of California denied the appeal of Fedex Ground Package System on November 29, 2007 contesting a trial court's decision on its drivers. Gohmann Asphalt and Construction from Indiana agreed to settle federal and state claims on the...

  • SIXTH AMENDMENT--INTERLOCKING CONFESSIONS AND THE BRUTON RULE.  // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Winter1979, Vol. 70 Issue 4, p439 

    This article cites the Supreme Court case Parker versus Randolph which concerned the admissibility of a co-defendant's confession that incriminates a defendant who has also confessed. Citing the case Bruton versus United States, the Supreme Court held that admission of a co-defendant's...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics