Schools Struggling To Meet Key Goal On Accountability

Hoff, David J.
January 2009
Education Week;1/7/2009, Vol. 28 Issue 16, p1
The article reports that nearly 30,000 schools in the United States failed to make adequate yearly progress under the federal No Child Left Behind Act in the 2007-08 school year. The number represents a huge increase compared to the previous year. The author examines the reasons that schools are failing to make annual yearly progress under the law.


Related Articles

  • Toward a National Consensus. Lagemann, Ellen Condliffe // Education Week;1/21/2009, Vol. 28 Issue 18, p44 

    The article suggests that the No Child Left Behind Act has hurt American education. According to the author, the incentives in the act deprive students of the opportunities to study interesting topics and make schools more likely to turn their back on students that are failing. Methods to fix...

  • Steep Climb To NCLB Goal For 23 States. Hoff, David J. // Education Week;6/4/2008, Vol. 27 Issue 39, p1 

    The article discusses the struggles of some U.S. schools to meet the reading and mathematics proficiency standards established by the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). The article describes how 23 states who set modest achievement standards during the first five years of NCLB are being held to...

  • Misuse of High-Stakes Test Scores for Evaluative Purposes: Neglecting the Reality of Schools and Students. Martin, Peter Clyde // Current Issues in Education;10/5/2012, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p1 

    The article examines high-stakes test scores in Washington, DC that are used to evaluate school quality for AYP purposes. On the basis of analyses of school scores in terms of subpopulations and neighborhood income, it is found that there are, district-wide, significant correlations between test...

  • Spellings Takes issue With NCLB Draft Bill. Hoff, David J. // Education Week;9/12/2007, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p21 

    The article discusses the reauthorization of the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) with which Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings and Representative George Miller have a disagreement. Spellings is concerned that there are too many loopholes in the proposed bills' educational...

  • Proposed Title I Changes Ease Tutoring Rules. Gewertz, Catherine // Education Week;4/8/2009, Vol. 28 Issue 28, p15 

    The article discusses the changes that have been proposed by U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan to the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). The proposed changes involve an update to accountability workbooks, a change to the rule that parents can relocate their child to another school if that...

  • Federal Rule Yields Hope For Science. Cavanagh, Sean // Education Week;10/10/2007, Vol. 27 Issue 7, p1 

    The article reports on science teaching in the U.S. The author notes that the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) requires states to begin testing students in science beginning in the 2007-2008 school year, and he explains that science educators hope this will bring focus onto science...

  • Author to Continue Protest Over NCLB. Klein, Alyson // Education Week;10/3/2007, Vol. 27 Issue 6, p23 

    The article focuses on education author Jonathan Kozol and his protest of the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). Kozol has undertaken a partial hunger strike that allows him to subsist primarily of liquids since July 2007. Kozol felt that the Democrats in the U.S. Congress would simply...

  • Testing…Testing…1-2-3 Congress needs to fix NCLB.  // American Teacher;Nov2007, Vol. 92 Issue 3, p14 

    The article presents suggestions for changes to the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) from the American Federation of Teachers (AFT). It is suggested that school quality by based on a number of factors and not solely on high-stakes tests, while another suggestion is to use new formulas to...

  • HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION. Ash, Katie // Education Week;8/29/2007, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p5 

    The article reports results of a 2007 Education Trust study on U.S. high school graduation rates. Results indicate that individual states are setting low graduation rate goals in order to ensure that they meet adequate yearly progress benchmarks for federal reporting in keeping with the No Child...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics