TITLE

U.S. Deployment of Nuclear Weapons in 1950s South Korea & North Korea's Nuclear Development: Toward Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula

AUTHOR(S)
Jae-Bong, Lee
PUB. DATE
February 2009
SOURCE
Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus;2/23/2009, Issue 8, p2
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The United States suffered a serious financial deficit as a result of the Korean War in the 1950s. To solve this problem, it moved to reduce the sizes of US forces in Korea and the South Korean military which depended on U.S. financial aid. As President Rhee Syng-man opposed this plan, the U.S. introduced nuclear weapons into South Korea in January 1958. For this purpose, the UN Command removed NNSC personnel from South Korea in June 1956, and nullified part of the Armistice Agreement in June 1957. As nuclear weapons were deployed in South Korea, North Korea began a massive program of underground construction in the 1960s and deployed its conventional forces in forward positions. North Korea asked the Soviet Union in 1963 and China in 1964 for help in developing nuclear weapons of its own, but was rebuffed. South Korea prepared to develop its own nuclear weapons in 1974 and North Korea began to develop its own program in the late 1970s. North Korea seeks, through development of nuclear weapons, to secure international recognition as well as economic aid and national security. Thus for the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, provision must be made for North Korea to dismantle its nuclear weapons without a sense of insecurity. In addition, it is unrealistic to urge North Korea to unilaterally dismantle its nuclear weapons without a breakthrough in U.S.-North Korea relations, preparing the withdrawal of US forces in South Korea, eliminating the U.S. nuclear umbrella for South Korea, and abolishing the U.S.-South Korea Alliance.
ACCESSION #
36670631

 

Related Articles

  • Nuclear consequences of the welfare state revisited: Danger in the data. Ayanian, Robert // Public Choice;May1989, Vol. 61 Issue 2, p167 

    Examines the reliability of the nuclear force levels data of the Soviet Union and the U.S. from 1965 through 1984. Basis of the nuclear force levels data; Views on the accuracy of the nuclear stockpiles of both nations; Disparities in the indexed number of U.S. and Soviet nuclear warheads

  • Burdens of proof. Steinbruner, John // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jan/Feb2007, Vol. 63 Issue 1, p59 

    The article offers observation on the danger brought about by access to nuclear energy that was once demonstrated at Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Scientists sought to convey constructive aspiration that might stimulate equal refinements in the management of human aggressiveness. It was...

  • Anti-American, Pro-Chinese Sentiment in South Korea. Yoo, Chan Yul // East Asia: An International Quarterly;Spring2005, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p18 

    Anti-American, pro-Chinese sentiment is spreading widely in South Korea. This phenomenon is caused by extreme US-ROK policy dissension over matters related to North Korea, especially the nuclear questions, and South Korea's emotional attachment for China based on historical and geopolitical...

  • BANDWAGON.  // New Republic;8/23/48, Vol. 119 Issue 8, p30 

    Presents an excerpt from an article on the atomic bomb by Hanson Baldwin published in the "New York Times" newspaper.

  • IAEA: Iran got blueprint from Pakistan nuke network.  // Geo-Strategy Direct;2/15/2006, p1 

    The article reports that Iran obtained design plans for producing nuclear warheads from Pakistan. The International Atomic Energy Agency has determined that at least one document obtained by Iran contained information on nuclear weapon assembly. Iran has acknowledged that the blueprint was...

  • BANDWAGON.  // New Republic;8/23/48, Vol. 119 Issue 8, p30 

    Presents an excerpt from an article on the atomic bomb by Hanson Baldwin published in the "New York Times" newspaper.

  • U.S. Needs Nuclear Weapons And Capability To Upgrade Them, DoE Official Says. Fein, Geoff // Defense Daily;1/26/2006, Vol. 229 Issue 16, p7 

    This article reports that the U.S. is going to need to retain nuclear weapons along with the capability to sustain and modernize them if necessary, according to Linton Brooks, administrator of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DoE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) as of January...

  • If There is a Summit Meeting, Let's Make it a Plug for Our Side!  // Saturday Evening Post;5/10/1958, Vol. 230 Issue 45, p10 

    Comments on the efforts of the Soviet Union to entice the U.S. into a Summit conference. Decision of the Soviet Union to suspend nuclear weapons tests; Implications of a Summit conference under Soviet terms; Proposal by A. N. Malyshev in the bulletin of the International Research on Communist...

  • Panel Questions Warhead Concept Plausibility. Boese, Wade // Arms Control Today;Nov2007, Vol. 37 Issue 9, p33 

    The article provides information on a study of the feasibility of the Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW) program conducted by JASON, an advisory group of scientists, in the U.S. in 2006. The objective of the initiative is to develop a warhead that is supposed to be less susceptible to accidents...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of NEW JERSEY STATE LIBRARY

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics