Esther, John
June 2008
Lesbian News;Jun2008, Vol. 33 Issue 11, p33
The article reports on the approval of same-sex marriages by the California Supreme Court on May 15, 2008. The court said that the state constitution should guarantee such basic right to all individuals and couples regardless of their sexual orientation. It added that sexual orientation, like race and gender, should not be a basis for denying legal rights to form a family relationship. The ruling made the Proposition 22 that limits marriage between man and woman passed in 2000 void.


Related Articles

  • California Court Invalidates Ban On Same-Sex Marriage. Deschenaux, Joanne // HR Magazine;Jul2008, Vol. 53 Issue 7, p19 

    The article reports on the decision of the California Supreme Court to invalidate the state's ban on same-sex marriage on May 15, 2008. The court ruled that preventing gay couples from marrying violates the state constitution. In a 120-page opinion, the majority of the court invalidated...

  • 'Suspect' Judgment. Keefe, Derek R. // Christianity Today;Jul2008, Vol. 52 Issue 7, p18 

    The article focuses on the implications of the decision of the California Supreme Court to overturn a state law prohibiting same-sex marriages on May 15, 2008, stating that sexual orientation was a suspect classification. It is explained that by labeling sexual orientation suspect, the court...

  • The Dutch say 'I do'.  // Advocate;10/24/2000, Issue 823, p13 

    Reports that Netherlands has become the first country to offer full marriage rights to gay and lesbian couples following parliamentary approval. Improvement over 'registered same-sex partnerships'; Conversion of discrimination into taboo after World War II; Public attitudes towards same-sex...

  • Money management and views of civil partnership in same-sex couples: results from a UK survey of non-heterosexuals. Burgoyne, Carole; Clarke, Victoria; Burns, Maree // Sociological Review;Nov2011, Vol. 59 Issue 4, p685 

    Recent legislation in the UK has extended many of the legal and financial rights and responsibilities of heterosexual marriage to same-sex couples who register their partnerships. Prior to the Civil Partnership Act (2004) however, little was known about financial arrangements in same-sex...

  • Go ahead, ask the people.  // Advocate;7/19/2005, Issue 943, p19 

    This article reports on the national vote conducted in Switzerland on the passage of a civil-unions law for gay couples in June 2005. Evangelical Christians in Switzerland were outraged by parliament's passage of a civil-unions law for gay couples in 2004, so they gathered the 50,000 signatures...

  • guest opinion. Monroe, Irene // Bay Windows;5/28/2009, Vol. 27 Issue 24, p7 

    The article presents the author's comments on the ruling of California Supreme Court against same-sex marriage, on May 26, 2009.

  • Calif. Court Weighs Prop 8. KEEN, LISA // Windy City Times;3/11/2009, Vol. 24 Issue 24, p1 

    The article reports on a hearing on whether to overturn Proposition 8, a constitutional amendment passed in November 2008 to ban same-sex marriage, held by the California Supreme Court in San Francisco on March 5, 2009.

  • Proposition 8 sponsors seek to nullify same-sex marriages.  // Gay & Lesbian Times;12/24/2008, Issue 1096, p14 

    The article reports on the Proposition 8 sponsors who requested the California Supreme Court to nullify the same-sex marriages.

  • California Supreme Court agrees to hear challenges to Prop 8.  // Empty Closet;Dec2008/Jan2009, Issue 419, p4A 

    The article reports that the California Supreme Court has agreed to hear legal challenges to the Proposition 8 that limits marriage between man and woman. The National Center for Lesbian Rights, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Lambda Legal had filed a lawsuit challenging the validity...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics