TITLE

Risks rising for 'delayed diagnosis' ED litigation

PUB. DATE
April 2009
SOURCE
ED Legal Letter;Apr2009, Vol. 20 Issue 4, p44
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the general liability risks and documentation related to the delayed diagnosis in the emergency department (ED). ED physician Matthew Rice reveals that failure to diagnosis is one of the most common causes of ED malpractice litigation. Scenarios that have a growing potential for litigation are outlined. A case of missed acute coronary syndrome is explained by assistant professor Jesse M. Pines.
ACCESSION #
37351263

 

Related Articles

  • Lawsuits may arise from ED 'boarding' practice.  // ED Legal Letter;Dec2008, Vol. 19 Issue 12, p136 

    The article focuses on the liability risks of boarding admitted patients in the emergency department (ED). It is inferred that the risk of a poor outcome increases when patients board for long periods. According to the article, most lawsuits related to ED crowding due to boarding will involve...

  • Lawsuits for Needless Tests? It's Possible.  // ED Legal Letter;Jun2010, Vol. 21 Issue 6, p68 

    The article discusses the lawsuits for tests that are unnecessary for emergency department (ED) patients. Dr. Matthew Rice of the Northwest Emergency Physicians of TEAMHealth explained that only few cases have become successful because of the plaintiff's inability to prove damages, but side...

  • MALPRACTICE Chronicle. D. M. L. // Clinician Reviews;Jul2011, Vol. 21 Issue 7, p10 

    This column discusses several U.S. court cases concerning medical practices. It describes the case of a 39-year-old man who alleged negligence in the emergency physician's failure to diagnose a fractured mandible and the case of a 50-year-old Pennsylvania woman who suffered bladder and ureter...

  • Testing confusion delays breast cancer Dx.  // Journal of Family Practice;Dec2008, Vol. 57 Issue 12, p824 

    The article discusses a court case wherein a 47-year-old plaintiff's claim that the physician has failed to follow up properly on her worsening fibrosis, allowing the cancer to grow undetected. The physician defended that their was no negligence occurred on the diagnosis and explained that the...

  • Coombes v. Florio : The Negative Consequences of Leaving Massachusetts Physicians Open to Endless Third-Party Liability. SCHWARTZ, KATHRYN J. // New England Law Review;Spring2011, Vol. 45 Issue 3, p777 

    The article discusses the case Coombes v. Florio and third-party liabilities of Massachusetts physicians. The Supreme Judicial Court decision on the Coombes case is seen to broadly extend the liability of physicians to third parties, to an extent that prescribing drugs may be a cause for...

  • Patient's estate sues after ignoring M.D.'s advice. Goldberg, David J. // Dermatology Times;Nov2005, Vol. 26 Issue 11, p6 

    Presents a case involving a physician who was sued by a patient's estate for alleged medical malpractice. Details of the planned surgical procedure; Requirement that the patient could not drive after the procedure; Decision of the patient to leave the office against medical advice.

  • PHYSICIANS ATTRIBUTE HIGHER COSTS TO DEFENSIVE MEDICINE.  // Medical Economics;3/19/2010, Vol. 87 Issue 6, p13 

    The article reports on a study that showed physicians attribute 26% of overall healthcare costs to the practice of ordering extra tests, referrals, procedures and hospitalizations to protect themselves from medical malpractice lawsuits.

  • Want to countersue? It's not that easy. Johnson, Lee J. // Medical Economics;10/11/99, Vol. 76 Issue 19, p179 

    Replies to an inquiry on a physician's ability to file a countersuit against a patient whose malpractice was dismissed by a court. Requirements for filing countersuits; Evidence needed to prevail in a countersuit; Obstacles to winning countersuits.

  • Unnecessary mastectomy: $6.5 million verdict in New York. Bachman, Radha V.; Reding, Barbara // Healthcare Risk Management;Sep2009 Legal Review, p1 

    The article discusses a court case wherein a woman, who underwent mastectomy, has sued various hospitals and physicians after finding out that the removed breast did not show any evidence of cancer.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics