April 2009
Accountancy;Apr2009, Vol. 143 Issue 1388, p36
Trade Publication
The article discusses the role of non-executive directors (NEDs) in business failures or business near-failures. The responsibilities borne by NEDs in ensuring good governance are examined. Topics of discussion include NEDs that are passive and ineffective in safeguarding shareholders' interests and examples of governance failure.


Related Articles

  • Corporate Governance and Earnings Management in Family-Controlled Companies. Prencipe, Annalisa; Bar-Yosef, Sasson // Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance;Apr2011, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p199 

    The corporate governance literature advances the idea that certain aspects of a board of directors’ structure improve the monitoring of managerial decisions. Among these decisions are a manager’s policies about managing earnings. Prior studies have shown that earnings management in...

  • Addressing the family BUSINESS WEAK SPOT. Roberts, Jeff // NZ Business;Mar2012, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p53 

    The author reminds family-owned businesses in New Zealand about the wisdom in appointing independent directors to the board and its significance to addressing structural weakness relating to governance. Any board of directors play an important responsibility in the future of a business...

  • The independent family business board. Jaffe, Dennis T.; Davis, Sam // Family Business;Winter2010, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p54 

    The article discusses the role of independent board directors in a family enterprise. Among the tasks of a board are leadership oversight, provision of strategic direction and mediation. Several recruitment and reward practices to help enhance the independence of boards are determination of the...

  • Why Privately Held and Family-Owned Businesses Should Have Independent Boards of Directors. KAMPEL, CARL // Financial Executive;Nov2012, Vol. 28 Issue 9, p18 

    The author looks at governance of family-owned and privately held businesses, presenting a case for having an independent board of directors even though it is not legally required. He discusses several benefits independent directors can confer, including providing accountability and guidance to...

  • THE CASE FOR THE OUTSIDE DIRECTOR IN THE CLOSELY HELD COMPANY. Kanter, Allen // Business Horizons;Dec79, Vol. 22 Issue 6, p39 

    Focuses on the role of outside directors on closely-traded companies in the United States. Recognition of the basic trends in the corporate operations; Advantages of outside directors over corporate directors; Accounts on the conflicting interest in a closely-held companies.

  • The Care and Feeding of the Board of Directors. Vance, Jack O. // California Management Review;Summer79, Vol. 21 Issue 4, p29 

    The article discusses the hazards of serving on a Board of Directors and what a corporation can do to ensure the protection of board members from lawsuits and scandals. The article describes why people are less likely to want to serve on a board of directors and stresses that the lines of...

  • Social Capital, Informal Governance, and Post-IPO Firm Performance: A Study of Chinese Entrepreneurial Firms. Cao, Jerry; Ding, Yuan; Zhang, Hua // Journal of Business Ethics;Apr2016, Vol. 134 Issue 4, p529 

    Social capital can serve as informal governance in weak investor-protection regimes. Using hand-collected data on entrepreneurs' political connections and firm ownership, we construct several original measures of social capital and examine their effect on the performance of entrepreneurial firms...

  • The Shift Is from Inside to Outside.  // Time;9/2/1957, Vol. 70 Issue 10, p68 

    The article focuses on the argument regarding the management of the inside and outside board of directors on the stockholder investments in the U.S. It says that the inside directors are also the officials of the corporations who control the technical side of the business, while the outside...

  • Board Composition: Balancing Family Influence in S&P 500 Firms. Anderson, Ronald C.; Reeb, David M. // Administrative Science Quarterly;Jun2004, Vol. 49 Issue 2, p209 

    We examine the mechanisms used to limit expropriation of firm wealth by large shareholders among S&P 500 firms with founding-family ownership. Consistent with agency theory, we find that the most valuable public firms are those in which independent directors balance family board representation....


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics