TITLE

FEDERAL STEM CELL GUIDELINES RELEASED

PUB. DATE
May 2009
SOURCE
USA Today Magazine;May2009, Vol. 137 Issue 2768, p7
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the guidelines for federal funding of research on human embryonic stem cells issued by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) in 2009. Funding for research on any stem cell lines taken from cloned human embryos through somatic cell nuclear transfer is not allowed based on the guidelines. The NIH is said to have decided not to consider research on alternative cellular reprogramming methods for federal funding. The legality of human reproductive cloning is retained at the federal level.
ACCESSION #
41036546

 

Related Articles

  • Hidden toll of embryo ethics war. Ledford, Heidi // Nature;3/17/2011, Vol. 471 Issue 7338, p279 

    The article offers information on the stem-cell injunction proposed by the National Institute of Health (NIH) in the U.S. It discusses the legal efforts of researchers to block the federal funding for research on human embryonic stem (ES) cells, noting that it destroys the embryos. It explores...

  • Stem cell regulation moves forward.  // New Scientist;7/11/2009, Vol. 203 Issue 2716, p7 

    The article reports on the final guidelines issued by the U.S. National Institutes of Health in July 2009 on expanding funding for research projects involving human embryonic stem cells (ESC). The guidelines grant a special working group the discretion to make older ESC lines eligible for...

  • A law in time?  // Nature;9/2/2010, Vol. 467 Issue 7311, p7 

    The article reports on the need for the U.S. Congress to act against the temporary suspension of the federal funding for human embryonic stem-cell research. It says that research funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) will be affected by the suspension. It states that to continue the...

  • CALIFORNIA SCHEMING.  // New Scientist;12/10/2005, Vol. 188 Issue 2529, p7 

    The article reports that Californian voters may have authorised the spending of $3 billion of public money on stem cell research over the next decade, but opponents of the plan are determined to make it as hard as possible to spend the money. Activists who oppose research on human embryonic stem...

  • Obama Directs Adoption of Stem Cell Guidelines.  // BioWorld Today;8/3/2009, Vol. 20 Issue 147, p6 

    The article reports on the order of U.S. President Barack Obama to heads of federal agencies to adopt final human embryonic stem cell (hESC) funding guidelines issued by the National Institutes of Health to the fullest extent practiceable in light of legal authorities and obligations. It notes...

  • Is a baby clone on board? Boyce, Nell // U.S. News & World Report;12/30/2002, Vol. 133 Issue 25, p80 

    Back in March of 1978, screaming headlines announced the arrival of the world's first human clone. Scientists had helped a bachelor millionaire create an heir in a land 'beyond Hawaii,' journalist David Rorvik claimed in the supposedly nonfiction account, 'In His Image.' Privacy concerns...

  • Stem cells: a new plan of attack. Harris, Jason // Hem/Onc Today;5/25/2009, Vol. 10 Issue 10, p1 

    The article explores the possible implications of the decision by U.S. President Barack Obama to lift the ban on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research on the development of new targeted therapies in oncology in 2009.

  • NIH to Decide Questions on Stem Cell Spending. Young, Donna // BioWorld Today;3/11/2009, Vol. 20 Issue 46, p1 

    The article reports on the signing by U.S. President Barack Obama of the executive order revoking an order signed by former U.S. President George W. Bush that limited federal funding of research involving human embryonic stem cell (hESC). The National Institutes of Health has been ordered to...

  • Embryonic Stem Cell Research Moves Slowly Through Appeals Courts, Cancer Trials. Jenks, Susan // JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute;Jul2011, Vol. 103 Issue 14, p1078 

    The article reports on the status of embryonic stem cell research in the U.S., noting the slow progress due to legal disputes which are affecting funding support. It cites the court case between the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the two scientists James Sherley and Theresa Deisher on...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics