TITLE

A instrumentalização da defesa dos direitos humanos: os interesses políticos por trás da guerra contra o terrorismo

AUTHOR(S)
JÚNIOR, HERMES MOREIRA
PUB. DATE
December 2008
SOURCE
Meridiano 47 - Boletim de Análise de Conjuntura em Relações I;dic2008, Issue 101, p45
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This text aims to analyze how the War on Terrorism's Doctrine has created a speech of protection of human rights, but using it as an instrument according to its strategic priorities.
ACCESSION #
41135913

 

Related Articles

  • COUNTERINSURGENCY OPERATIONS. Wojdakowski, Walter // Infantry;Sep/Oct2007, Vol. 96 Issue 5, p1 

    The author discusses the future for U.S. infantrymen in counterinsurgency operations, the need for adaptive leaders and soldiers and some new innovations. Today's infantrymen are the cutting edge of a lethal, offensive force, and hence must rapidly execute across the full spectrum of operations...

  • Beyond the 'War on Terror': Hegemony, Violence, and the 'Global Democratic Revolution'. Gills, Barry K. // Global Dialogue;Summer/Autumn2006, Vol. 8 Issue 3/4, p90 

    The article offers insights on the approach used by United States to pursue "war on terror" and "global democracy promotion." The author argues that it is difficult to confront a global power structure like U.S. which uses violence while attempting to legitimize itself by constantly appealing to...

  • JUDGMENT, EXPERIENCE, AND LEADERSHIP: CANDIDATE DEBATES ON THE IRAQ WAR IN THE 2008 PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARIES. BOSTDORFF, DENISE M. // Rhetoric & Public Affairs;Summer2009, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p223 

    The examination of 25 pre-primary and primary debates of the 2008 campaign indicates most Republicans, over time, moved toward ever stronger support of President Bush and the surge policy, while continuing to link meeting the challenge in Iraq with the war on terror and moral resolve. The...

  • Can the War on Terror Be Won? Gordon, Philip H. // Foreign Affairs;Nov/Dec2007, Vol. 86 Issue 6, p53 

    The article discusses workable U.S. approaches to the war on terror, with recommendations to first define victory more clearly, which involves accepting that the terrorist threat can never be eradicated completely. Then the authors advise finding ways to discredit the terrorists' ideology and...

  • The President's Empty Rhetoric on Drones. HUFFINGTON, ARIANNA // Progressive Populist;8/15/2013, Vol. 19 Issue 14, p11 

    The author asserts that the U.S. government should start accepting hard truths about the war on terror, including the fact that drone strikes do not make Americans safer.

  • War on Terror and its Unanticipated Effects on Pakistan. Javaid, Umbreen // Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities (1994-7046);Sep2010, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p101 

    Pakistan is the worst hit country due to War or Terrorism especially in terms of growing extremism which has led to increasing number of suicide attacks, radicalization and militancy resulting in a tense and fearful environment within society and eventually has to face the stigma of producing...

  • Return of the Jihadi. EXUM, ANDREW // Democracy: A Journal of Ideas;Summer2009, Issue 9, p44 

    This article highlights the need for U.S. political leaders to pay attention and create plans on how to deal with the global spread of jihadists bent on attacking U.S. interests at home and abroad. It says that the jihadists in Iraq and Afghanistan have spread to countries in Europe, the Middle...

  • WHY UNLEASHING MILITARY FORCE AGAINST TERRORISM IS ILLEGAL, IMMORAL, AND JUST PLAIN DUMB. Razumovsky, Galina // Suffolk Transnational Law Review;Winter2015, Vol. 38 Issue 1, p141 

    The author argues that the American government's use of military force against terrorism is illegal, immoral, and futile, and claims that the U.S. military has been involved in excessive use of force incidents and violations of human rights. According to the article, the war on terror rhetoric...

  • Point: Justification for the War on Terror. Pearson, John // Points of View: War on Terror;3/1/2016, p5 

    This article presents an argument that the United States-led war on terrorism is justified. Significant and proactive action against terrorists were long overdue by the time the attacks of September 11, 2001 made it clear that terrorism threatens the lives, freedoms and economic well-being of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics