Court rejects hospital's attempt to limit admitting privileges

June 2009
Contemporary OB/GYN;Jun2009, Vol. 54 Issue 6, p27
Academic Journal
The article discusses a court case, published in "American Medical News," wherein a state trial court in Arkansas determined that it was improper for a hospital to use a credentialing policy that denied admitting privileges to physicians with interest in their competitors. The case involved Baptist Health's decision to implement an economic conflict-of-interest policy in 2003. This resulted in the loss of privileges for 12 staff cardiologists who owned the specialty facility Arkansas Heart Hospital.


Related Articles

  • When a Patient Leaves Against Medical Advice. FLEETER, THOMAS B. // AAOS Now;Nov2012, Vol. 6 Issue 11, p35 

    The article discusses the legal consequences after patients leave against medical advice (AMA) from a hospital. It is stated that if a patient leaves AMA after a dispute with the physician, courts may view the physician as liable for premature discharge; and the plaintiff is often successful...

  • Pilot crashes. Becker, Cinda // Modern Healthcare;4/19/2004, Vol. 34 Issue 16, p6 

    Focuses on the decision of U.S. District Judge John Bissell in Newark, New Jersey to place a permanent injunction on the bonus-payment demonstration project launched in January 2004 by the Center for Measurement of Science and the New Jersey Hospital Association. Lawsuit filed by four hospitals...

  • Canadian court decisions highlight obscure disability benefit rules. Gonzalez, Gloria // Business Insurance;5/29/2006, Vol. 40 Issue 22, p21 

    The article focuses on court decisions which highlight some obscure disability-related liabilities facing Canadian employers as of May 2006. In two cases, courts have held employers responsible for providing disability benefits for an unspecified period after terminating employees, highlighting...

  • FOCUS ON DISCLOSURE AND MISREPRESENTATION. Hesse, Katherine A.; Ehrens, Doris R. MacKenzie // Benefits Quarterly;1998 Second Quarter, Vol. 14 Issue 2, p86 

    This section provides an update on several court rulings concerning various employee benefits-related cases in the U.S. as of June 1998. In Jane Doe v. Travelers Insurance Co., decisions of out-of-court decision makers with discretionary authority are reviewed using an arbitrary and capricious...

  • Part-time firefighters win out.  // Employee Benefits;Apr2008, p17 

    The article reports on the victory of the Fire Brigades Union (FBU) over a legal conflict to ensure that part-time firefighters working on an emergency call system receive the same benefits as full-timers. Firefighters working retained duty are claimed to be discriminated against when they are...

  • Bonuses. Glavina, Joe; Harris, Judith // Employers Law;Feb2007, p9 

    The article discusses the ruling of the British Court of Appeal over a compensation dispute involving Commerzbank AG and a certain employee. The plaintiff claimed that his bonus payment was inadequate. The court ruled that the plaintiff cannot refer to the Unfair Contract Terms Act of 1977 to...

  • N.Y. county's 'play-or-pay' mandate pre-empted by ERISA, judge rules. Wojcik, Joanne // Business Insurance;7/23/2007, Vol. 41 Issue 30, p4 

    This article reports that a federal court has invalidated the two-year-old Suffolk County, New York, play-or-pay health care mandate that requires certain retailers to provide a prescribed level of health insurance to their nonmanagement workers. The Suffolk County law is pre-empted by the...

  • CAN YOU DECIDE THE CASE OF THE WOULD-BE MEMBER?  // Labor Law Journal;Apr51, Vol. 2 Issue 4, p278 

    The article presents information about the fact that can one decide the case of the would-be member. In a company which had a Quarter Century Club for old-timers, a man who had completed his twenty-five years of service-with one interruption-wanted to join the club. Membership had other than...

  • Appeals for disability benefits face long wait, case backlog. Tramer, Harriet // Crain's Cleveland Business;1/8/2007, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p14 

    The article reports that the clients of disability benefits have to wait a long period for decision from a federal administrative law judge in Cleveland, Ohio. Mark Lassiter, an officer with Social Security's National Press Office, provided figures illustrating that the number of pending cases...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics