TITLE

Forging the Future of American Security with a Total Force Strategy

AUTHOR(S)
Floersheim, LTC Bruce
PUB. DATE
June 2009
SOURCE
Orbis;Jun2009, Vol. 53 Issue 3, p471
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
An intense debate now rages concerning whether the Army should be preparing and organizing to conduct more ambiguous, irregular operations or focus on maintaining its well honed edge in high-intensity warfare. The terms of the debate are clearly affected by the fact that United States is currently embroiled in perilous counterinsurgency and other irregular operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Should the Army recalibrate itself to wage counterinsurgency and other irregular operations more effectively, or does it need to keep doing what it does best with an eye to future conventional warfare? Given the impossibility of accurately predicting the character of future conflict, it is necessary for the Army to strike a balance between the extremes. But for the Army to effectively implement a policy of “balance,” it must be prepared to dramatically change the way it organizes itself and drop its opposition to specializing its forces for irregular and conventional warfare, respectively. The approach that the Army should take should be based upon a Total Force construct. By utilizing the entire Total Force portfolio, it should be possible to better optimize the mix of ground units prepared for conventional war, irregular war or peace operations to avoid a mis-match between national security strategy and military force. In this manner, it may be possible to stake our claim on the hard won lessons of Iraq and Afghanistan, yet hedge against the unknowable future.
ACCESSION #
41684214

 

Related Articles

  • THE CHIEF'S CORNER. DALESSANDRO, ROBERT J. // Army History;Spring2013, Issue 87, p3 

    In this article, the author reflects on the activities of the U.S. Army community since 2012. He mentions that during this, the community totally focused on providing historical support to military operations in theater. He notes that several new exhibits are being developed in the Pentagon one...

  • WHY OPERATIONS ASSESSMENTS FAIL. Schroden, Jonathan // Naval War College Review;Autumn2011, Vol. 64 Issue 4, p89 

    The article discusses military operations assessments, which measure progress toward objectives, particularly focusing on U.S. efforts in the Afghan War and the Iraq War. The author comments on what he sees as assessments' failures and provides several recommendations. He reflects on doctrinal...

  • Getting in Tune with Special Operations. Rawley, Christopher // U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings;Sep2005, Vol. 131 Issue 9, p40 

    The article focuses on the role played by the U.S. Navy in special military operations. Special operations forces are well suited for success in the prolonged, global fight against a loosely aligned network of Islamic jihadists. U.S. conventional armed forces, however, are not properly oriented...

  • Out of Afghanistan.  // Christian Century;12/27/2011, Vol. 128 Issue 26, p7 

    The article presents the author's opinions regarding the U.S.-led Afghan War and its prospects as of 2011. It is asserted that as the U.S. has concluded its military activities and troop presence in the Iraq War it should likewise declare its operations in Afghanistan as accomplished and work...

  • Learn the lessons of Vietnam. BAIRD, JONATHAN P. // New Hampshire Business Review;9/25/2009, Vol. 31 Issue 21, p21 

    In this article the author reflects upon the need to stop unjustified military operations in other countries by the U.S. He criticizes the reasons given in favor of Afghanistan and Iraq wars, and discusses the financial impact of such wars on the U.S. He opines that the U.S. government should...

  • Making a Difference in KIRKUK. Alberts, Mike // Soldiers;Jun2007, Vol. 62 Issue 6, p4 

    This article focuses on the U.S. Army operation in Kirkuk, Iraq. Among the units deployed in the city is the 25th Infantry Division's 3rd Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IBCT), whose mission is to train members of Iraq's security forces. The U.S. soldiers are also responsible for securing Iraq's...

  • Spectrum of Care Provided at an Echelon II Medical Unit during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Murray, Clinton K.; Reynolds, Joel C.; Schroeder, Jodelle M.; Harrison, Matthew B.; Evans, Osceola M.; Hospenthal, Duane R. // Military Medicine;Jun2005, Vol. 170 Issue 6, p516 

    We describe the types of medical problems encountered at a U.S. Army echelon II medical facility during Operation Iraqi Freedom in the period after completion of major ground combat operations, a time of nation restructuring and intermittent, intense, armed conflict. A total of 4.831 patients...

  • Suicide Bombings in Operation Iraqi Freedom. Bunker, Robert J.; Sullivan, John P. // Military Review;Jan/Feb2005, Vol. 85 Issue 1, p69 

    Focuses on the suicide bombings against the U.S. Army during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Suicide operations within three dominant philosophical military traditions; Terrorist groups that have engaged in suicide bombings; Operational advantages of suicide bombings over normal terrorist bombings.

  • TF 1-15 An Infantry Task Force Goes to War. Durante, Arthur A.; Eno, Russell A. // Infantry;Winter2003, Vol. 92 Issue 2, p21 

    Discusses the operation of the U.S. Army's Task Force 1-15 Infantry during Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) in 2003. Preparations made by the infantry for OIF; Weapons used by the infantry during their first enemy encounter; Number of Iraqi soldiers that were killed and captured by Task Force...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics