TITLE

Court Would Likely Reject McCain-Feingold

AUTHOR(S)
Robinson, Matthew
PUB. DATE
March 2001
SOURCE
Human Events;03/26/2001, Vol. 57 Issue 12, p5
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Examines the constitutionality of the proposed campaign-finance reform bill by Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) based on the rulings of the United States Supreme Court. Limitations of the bill; Criticism of the proposal; Overview of the cases presented.
ACCESSION #
4255611

 

Related Articles

  • Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley: Constitutionality of Limits on Contributions in Ballot Measure Campaigns.  // California Law Review;Jul81, Vol. 69 Issue 4, p1001 

    Discusses the constitutionality of limits on contributions in ballot measure campaigns in the case Citizens Against Rent Control versus City of Berkeley. Description of the U.S. Supreme Court's framework for the first amendment analysis of campaign spending laws; Information on Supreme Court...

  • New McCain Bill Violates 1st Amendment. Robinson, Matthew // Human Events;01/29/2001, Vol. 57 Issue 4, p5 

    Discusses the free speech issues related to the campaign finance bill proposed by United States (U.S.) Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) and other legislators on January 22, 2001. Reaction from both Republican and Democratic Parties; Precedent from several U.S. Supreme Court cases; Information on...

  • What Next? Carney, Eliza Newlin // National Journal;5/10/2003, Vol. 35 Issue 19, p1454 

    Focuses on the legal disputes over campaign finance culminating in the U.S. Supreme Court's consideration of the constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002. Speculation on the ruling of the Supreme Court regarding the law; Dispute among legislators over campaign finance...

  • Clock Ticking on Contribution Limits?  // National Journal;1/30/99, Vol. 31 Issue 5, p239 

    States that the United States Supreme Court has decided to tackle the issue on federal campaign finance laws. Decision of the Supreme Court to review a constitutional challenge to Missouri's contribution limit; Expectation that many amicus brief will be submitted on the case.

  • Two Section 1983 cases highlight term's early decisions. Young, Rowland L. // American Bar Association Journal;Feb82, Vol. 68 Issue 2, p199 

    Presents updates on cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, as of the court holiday recess in December 1981. Decisions on cases involving public defenders; Youth Corrections Act; Campaign contributions.

  • High Court's Ruling Stirs Debate Over G-37. Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;6/28/2006, Vol. 356 Issue 32412, p4 

    The article focuses on the impact of the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court about strict limits on campaign spending and contributions of Vermont on Rule G-37 of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. The rule specifies to prevent dealers from engaging in municipal securities business with...

  • TIMING IS EVERYTHING: A NEW MODEL FOR COUNTERING CORRUPTION WITHOUT SILENCING SPEECH IN ELECTIONS. Levinson, Jessica A. // St. Louis University Law Journal;Spring2011, Vol. 55 Issue 3, p853 

    The article focuses on the consequences of the judgment in the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. U.S. Federal Election Committee (FEC). Information is provided on how the decision struck down all prohibitions on corporations' use of general funds to make campaign donations but failed to...

  • New Rules of the Game. Carney, Eliza Newlin; Stone, Peter H.; Barnes, James A. // National Journal;12/20/2003, Vol. 35 Issue 51/52, p3800 

    Comments on the flow of unregulated campaign funds in the U.S. despite the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court to deny a campaign finance law that bans the campaign contributions. Implications of the ruling to the U.S. political system; Criticisms against the law; Action taken by political parties...

  • Failed Rescue: Why Davis v. FEC Signals the End to Effective Clean Elections. Crosland, E. Stewart // Washington & Lee Law Review;Jun2009, Vol. 66 Issue 3, p1265 

    The article discusses U.S. public campaign financing while focusing on the U.S. Supreme Court case, Davis v. FEC. It discusses Davis questions about the efficacy of a campaign finance reform measure known as Clean Elections by placing rescue funds. Furthermore, it analyzes whether after Davis'...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics