Court Would Likely Reject McCain-Feingold

Robinson, Matthew
March 2001
Human Events;03/26/2001, Vol. 57 Issue 12, p5
Examines the constitutionality of the proposed campaign-finance reform bill by Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) based on the rulings of the United States Supreme Court. Limitations of the bill; Criticism of the proposal; Overview of the cases presented.


Related Articles

  • A Beltway Bungee Jump. Alter, Jonathan // Newsweek (Atlantic Edition);04/09/2001 (Atlantic Edition), Vol. 137 Issue 15, p46 

    Focuses on campaign-finance reform legislation proposed by United States Senators John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Russ Feingold (D-Wisc.). Issue of a ban on so-called soft money contributions; Obstacles to the bill's passage, including the opposition of Representative Tom Delay (R-Tex.); How McCain...

  • Senator rides to ISPs' rescue. Rohde, David // Network World;03/30/98, Vol. 15 Issue 13, p31 

    Presents information on the backing of Internet service providers by Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John McCain. How he plans to help them; Reason for his getting involved; Reference to the Federal Communication Commission (FCC); What impact a letter to Congress by the FCC could have on...

  • Is Richard Sherman a thug? It's all in the eye of the beholder. HICKS, JONATHAN P. // New York Amsterdam News;1/30/2014, Vol. 105 Issue 5, p14 

    The article focuses on the criticisms made by Senator John McCain against Seattle Seahawks cornerback Richard Sherman, calling Sherman a loudmouth for being competed with fellow football player Peyton Manning for the post-National Football Conference (NFC) Championship in 2014.

  • Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley: Constitutionality of Limits on Contributions in Ballot Measure Campaigns.  // California Law Review;Jul81, Vol. 69 Issue 4, p1001 

    Discusses the constitutionality of limits on contributions in ballot measure campaigns in the case Citizens Against Rent Control versus City of Berkeley. Description of the U.S. Supreme Court's framework for the first amendment analysis of campaign spending laws; Information on Supreme Court...

  • New McCain Bill Violates 1st Amendment. Robinson, Matthew // Human Events;01/29/2001, Vol. 57 Issue 4, p5 

    Discusses the free speech issues related to the campaign finance bill proposed by United States (U.S.) Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) and other legislators on January 22, 2001. Reaction from both Republican and Democratic Parties; Precedent from several U.S. Supreme Court cases; Information on...

  • What Next? Carney, Eliza Newlin // National Journal;5/10/2003, Vol. 35 Issue 19, p1454 

    Focuses on the legal disputes over campaign finance culminating in the U.S. Supreme Court's consideration of the constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002. Speculation on the ruling of the Supreme Court regarding the law; Dispute among legislators over campaign finance...

  • Clock Ticking on Contribution Limits?  // National Journal;1/30/99, Vol. 31 Issue 5, p239 

    States that the United States Supreme Court has decided to tackle the issue on federal campaign finance laws. Decision of the Supreme Court to review a constitutional challenge to Missouri's contribution limit; Expectation that many amicus brief will be submitted on the case.

  • The World Isn't So Dark. Zakaria, Fareed // Newsweek (Atlantic Edition);9/22/2008 (Atlantic Edition), Vol. 152 Issue 13, p17 

    This editorial discusses how 2008 U.S. presidential candidates John McCain and Barack Obama view the world. It claims that McCain sees the world as a dangerous place populated by Islamic extremists and emerging autocracies, while Obama more optimistically imagines a world in which the threats...

  • Two Section 1983 cases highlight term's early decisions. Young, Rowland L. // American Bar Association Journal;Feb82, Vol. 68 Issue 2, p199 

    Presents updates on cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, as of the court holiday recess in December 1981. Decisions on cases involving public defenders; Youth Corrections Act; Campaign contributions.

  • TIMING IS EVERYTHING: A NEW MODEL FOR COUNTERING CORRUPTION WITHOUT SILENCING SPEECH IN ELECTIONS. Levinson, Jessica A. // St. Louis University Law Journal;Spring2011, Vol. 55 Issue 3, p853 

    The article focuses on the consequences of the judgment in the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. U.S. Federal Election Committee (FEC). Information is provided on how the decision struck down all prohibitions on corporations' use of general funds to make campaign donations but failed to...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics