Koppelman, Andrew
April 2009
Northwestern University Law Review;2009 Special Issue, Vol. 103 Issue 2, p727
Academic Journal
This article discusses the originalist interpretations of the Establishment Clause by U.S. Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. It shows the indifference between their originalist interpretations of the clause and the original purposes of that clause. It references opinions of the judges on some cases that apply the clause, including Edwards v. Aguillard which involves the teaching of creation science in public schools. In addition, the article examines the move of Thomas to insist on originalism as a formula for constraining judicial discretion.


Related Articles

  • Not a Matter of Interpretation. Steven Knapp; Benn Michaels, Walter // San Diego Law Review;Spring2005, Vol. 42 Issue 2, p651 

    The article analyzes the dispute over the interpretation of the text of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Despite the clarity with which it was written, the authors of the statute were unable to keep it from being misinterpreted. One of the few rules of statutory interpretation that...

  • STOGNER v. CALIFORNIA: certiorari to the court of appeal of california, first appellate circuit.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Stogner v. California, case number 01-1757, argued on March 31, 2003 and decided on June 26, 2003. The case focuses on a criminal prosecution brought by the state of California against Marion Reynolds Stogner which allegedly violated...

  • A `Narrowly Tailored' Look. Savage, David G. // ABA Journal;May2000, Vol. 86 Issue 5, p31 

    Deals with the issue regarding the United States Supreme Courts' rulings on nude dancing. Information on the case, `City of Erie, Pennsylvania versus Pap's A.M.'; Comments from justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas on Erie's public indecency law regulation; What the justices say regarding...

  • Thomas leads Court's lean to the right. Marquand, Robert // Christian Science Monitor;6/26/95, Vol. 87 Issue 147, p1 

    Assesses the significance of the emergence of the conservative axis in the Supreme Court due to Justice Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. Focus on Clarence's opinion on race, affirmative action and limiting fundamental powers of the federal government; Comparison between the two.

  • Moving On, Moving In, Moving Up. Klaidman, Daniel; Rosenberg, Debra; Lipper, Tamara // Newsweek;2/17/2003, Vol. 141 Issue 7, p9 

    Comments on possible candidates for the position of U.S. Supreme Court Justice should Justices William Rehnquist and Sandra Day O'Connor choose to resign. Idea of elevating Associate Justice Antonin Scalia to replace Rehnquist as chief; Importance of consensus building as a characteristic of...

  • The Good Old Days. Regnery, Alfred S. // American Spectator;Apr2010, Vol. 43 Issue 3, p14 

    The article discusses how Justices William Rehnquist and Antonin Scalia have changed the U.S. Supreme Court for the better. It cites the book "American Original: The Life and Constitution of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia," by Joan Biskupic which talks about Justice Scalia. Journalist...

  • Men of the Year: Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas.  // Human Events;12/29/2000, Vol. 56 Issue 48, p1 

    Features United States Supreme Court Judges William Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas. Criticism on Supreme Court decisions; Information on the court's decision in the Boys Scouts of America versus Dale; Overview of the three judges' integrity; Evidence of Scalia's commitment to the...

  • Court Disrupts Social Order.  // Human Events;6/30/2003, Vol. 59 Issue 22, p7 

    Presents an excerpt from the reaction of U.S. Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia to the opinion of the Supreme Court on the case Lawrence versus Texas, about sodomy law. Discussion on the issue of morality as a basis of regulation; Views of the court...

  • Judge ye not the book by its cover. Maddox Jr., Alton H. // New York Amsterdam News;8/4/2005, Vol. 96 Issue 32, p12 

    The article focuses on the nomination of Judge Clarence Thomas as the successor to Justice Thurgood Marshall. It is suggested that Thomas was nominated to give the Catholic Church a second seat on the U.S. Supreme Court and to give Justice Antonin Scalia a sidekick. Major corporations are...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics