TITLE

FYI

PUB. DATE
May 2009
SOURCE
Tax Strategist;May2009, Vol. 4 Issue 5, p8
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article offers information related to taxation in U.S. Accordingly, to save for retirement is the reason why an automatic enrollment 401 (k) encourages more employees. Moreover, there is a penalty of 10 percent imposed on client if he/she taps an annuity before age 59.5. Furthermore, a special opportunity for certain small businesses with net operating losses (NOLs) was created by the new economic stimulus.
ACCESSION #
43315373

 

Related Articles

  • Significant Business-Related Tax Law Changes under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2009 Q1, Special section p1 

    The article summarizes the changes to the U.S. federal business-related tax law under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. It notes that taxpayers are allowed by the 2009 Act to elect to postpone cancellation of indebtedness income (COD) originating from a reacquisition of an...

  • Tax Update: What Difference a Year Makes. Kofinas, Chaim // New Jersey CPA;Nov/Dec2009, p8 

    The article examines the impact of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 enacted by U.S. President Barack Obama on the taxation in the U.S. It explains that due to ARRA, the net operating loss carryback period was extended up to five years for business with less than 15 million...

  • TAXTIP: How Tax Changes in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Affect Businesses.  // National Public Accountant;Jun/Jul2009, Vol. 8 Issue 3, p47 

    The article discusses the beneficial changes provided in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. It says that the Act extends the bonus depreciation until after 2009 to offer businesses with extra depreciation deduction for first year of new assets. It adds that small businesses,...

  • Your loss is your gain. J. L. // Entrepreneur;Oct2009, Vol. 37 Issue 10, p82 

    The article offers information on a tax provision that is included in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 in the U.S. It notes that the provision allows offsetting of the net operating loss against the income gained in 2008 of small businesses. Provided the circumstance, taxes...

  • Net Operating Loss Carryback Period Extended for Certain Small Businesses.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2009 Q1, Special section p1 

    The article focuses on the extension of the carryback period for applying net operating losses (NOLs) between 2008 and 2009 in taxable income in previous five years given to certain small business under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Small businesses having average gross revenues...

  • Maximizing cash flow by accelerating refunds or even (gasp!) preventing them. JONES, GEORGE G.; LUSCOMBE, MARK A. // Accounting Today;2/23/2009, Vol. 23 Issue 3, p14 

    This article offers a look at ways in which U.S. taxpayers can improve their cash flow. Particular focus is given to the impact of an economic stimulus package on the dynamics of businesses' filing of 2008 tax year returns. There are new procedures that can help taxpayers accelerate a tax refund...

  • Net Operating Loss Rules to Live By. Schwarz, William // New Jersey CPA;Nov/Dec2009, p28 

    The article discusses topic related to the net operating loss (NOL) in the U.S. It defines the NOL under the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) § 172 (c) as the excess of deductions over gross income. In this connection, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 extended the carryback...

  • Economic Myths: We Separate Fact From Fiction. Grabell, Michael // Pro Publica;8/15/2011, p2 

    The article offers information on the myths related to the U.S. economy. It states that tax rates are not high while spending of income on taxes is the lowest from 1958 in the U.S. The stimulus package of 2009 is not as helpful in employment generation as it is required. It also states that the...

  • Eye on the Stimulus: Nearly One-Third of Stimulus Paid Out in 2009. Flavelle, Christopher // Pro Publica;1/ 3/2010, p12 

    The article reports that the U.S. federal government has spent 254 billion dollars of the 792 billion dollars authorized under the stimulus package. As stated, the figure includes 161 billion dollars in direct spending and an estimated 93 billion dollars in tax cuts. It also reports that...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics