TITLE

Proportionality: An assault on human rights?

AUTHOR(S)
Tsakyrakis, Stavros
PUB. DATE
July 2009
SOURCE
International Journal of Constitutional Law;Jul2009, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p468
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Balancing is the main method used by a number of constitutional courts around the world to resolve conflicts of fundamental rights. The European Court of Human Rights routinely balances human rights against each other and against conflicting public interests; it has elevated proportionality to the status of a basic principle of interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). This paper examines the debate on balancing in the context of American constitutional law and the convention and discusses theories that claim some form of balancing is inherent in human rights adjudication. It argues that proportionality constitutes a misguided quest for precision and objectivity in the resolution of human rights disputes, and it suggests that courts should focus, instead, on the real moral issues underlying such disputes.
ACCESSION #
43485798

 

Related Articles

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics