Fighting Campaign Finance Reform

Kosterlitz, Julie
September 2009
National Journal;9/5/2009, p5
The article deals with the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to hold a rehearing of Citizens United versus Federal Election Commission on September 9, 2009, and its impact on the legal challenges against campaign finance laws filed by James Bopp. It outlines the arguments raised by Bopp against the Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act. It explores the ideological and political links of the opposition to campaign finance laws in line with the prevalence of conservative and Republican Party activists in the campaign against campaign finance laws.


Related Articles

  • MR. PRECEDENT. Mencimer, Stephanie // Mother Jones;May/Jun2011, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p54 

    The article presents a profile of lawyer James Bopp, whose practice focuses on campaign-finance law. Bopp has been involved in prominent court cases including Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. His litigation in favor of removing campaign contribution limits and keeping the names of...

  • CITIZENS UNITED AND THE ORPHANED ANTIDISTORTION RATIONALE. Hasen, Richard L. // Georgia State University Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p989 

    An essay is presented on the rationale of orphaned antidistortion in the court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) in the U.S. It discusses how the argument concerning antidistortion became an orphan in Citizens United blaming the dissent of Supreme Court Justice John Paul...

  • The Race Is On. Fischer, Raymond L. // USA Today Magazine;Nov2011, Vol. 140 Issue 2798, p18 

    The article asserts that the 2010 decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Citizens United versus (v.) the Federal Election Commission overturning a long-term trend to limit political spending of corporations will set the stage for a lucrative 2012 presidential campaign. It mentions that the...

  • CONTRACTING AROUND CITIZENS UNITED. Sitaraman, Ganesh // Columbia Law Review;Apr2014, Vol. 114 Issue 3, p755 

    The Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. FEC is widely considered a major roadblock for campaign finance reform, and particularly for limiting third party spending in federal elections. In response to the decision, commentators, scholars, and activists have outlined a wide range of...

  • HAS THE TIDE TURNED IN FAVOR OF DISCLOSURE? REVEALING MONEY IN POLITICS AFTER CITIZENS UNITED AND DOE V. REED. Torres-Spelliscy, Ciara // Georgia State University Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p1057 

    The article examines the campaign finance disclosure law following the U.S. Supreme Court decisions in cases Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission (FEC) and Doe v. Reed from 2007 to 2010. It explores the hostility exhibited by lower courts between Wisconsin Right to Life II (WRTL II)...

  • THE CAMPAIGN FINANCE DEBATE AFTER CITIZENS UNITED. Kang, Michael S. // Georgia State University Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p1147 

    The author offers his insight on campaign finance law debate on the Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission (FEC) in the U.S. He describes the decision of Citizens United that restrictions on corporate electioneering in federal elections are unconstitutional. He notes...

  • Should Media Consultants Really Jump for Joy? D'Aprile, Shane // Politics (Campaigns & Elections);Mar2010, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p14 

    The article talks about the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the case of Citizens United and the potential response to media consultants to the decision. It cites several disadvantages such as the rise in expenditures, creating a strategic problem for candidate campaigns, more airway clutter, and...

  • SUPREME COURT TO OK AL QAEDA DONATION FOR PALIN? Palast, Greg // Progressive Populist;2/1/2010, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p13 

    The article reports on the would-be decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on corporate and institutional donations to political candidates. It mentions that the issue is whether corporations as an unnatural person can make contributions to political campaigns. It notes that the would-be ruling of...

  • Amend the Constitution To Restore Public Trust in the Political System: A Practitioner's Perspective on Campaign Finance Reform. Udall, Senator Tom // Yale Law & Policy Review;Fall2010, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p235 

    An essay on the decision of U.S. Supreme Court on Citizens United's campaign finance reform is presented. The author states that Supreme Court's decision favoring the campaign finance system of Citizens that allow unlimited funding of big corporations and unions for a candidate opens an interest...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics