TITLE

'This stuff is wrong.'

AUTHOR(S)
Loomis, Carol J.; Hjelt, Paola
PUB. DATE
June 2001
SOURCE
Fortune;6/25/2001, Vol. 143 Issue 14, p72
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the salaries of executives as of June, 2001. How executives and investors view executive salaries; Views of several directors and compensation committee members on executive pay; Views regarding options, salaries, and stockholder interests.
ACCESSION #
4607326

 

Related Articles

  • 'This stuff is wrong.' Loomis, Carol J.; Hjelt, Paola // Fortune International (Europe);06/25/2001, Vol. 143 Issue 14, p36 

    Focuses on the salaries of executives as of June, 2001. How executives and investors view executive salaries; Views of several directors and compensation committee members on executive pay; Views regarding options, salaries, and stockholder interests.

  • The salary myth -- size does matter. Balls, Ashley // NZ Business;May99, Vol. 13 Issue 4, p51 

    Focuses on the salary grading in the business sector of New Zealand. Misconceptions on the setting of salaries for selected key personnel; Illustration of the salary system adopted by Contact Energy; Link between salaries and lifestyles.

  • Executive compensation--how directors can capitalize on the public forum approach. Lewis, Edwin W. // NACD Directorship;Jul/Aug95, Vol. 21 Issue 7, p11 

    Looks at the regulations of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on executive compensation as opportunities for shareholder communication. Events having impact on board decisions; Significance of the requirement for elements of compensation to be reported in greater detail;...

  • CEO Pay DEBATE. Sankar, R.; Alaganandan, Padmaja // Business Today;7/1/2007, Vol. 16 Issue 13, p82 

    The article examines several issues regarding the compensation of chief executive officers (CEOs) in India. It is argued that Indian CEO compensation is far below global levels, even if it grows at a faster pace. Several potential impacts of this growth, such as global mobility, are cited. In...

  • RED-HOT SNAPPERS!  // Canadian Dimension;Jul/Aug2005, Vol. 39 Issue 4, p4 

    The article presents information related to Canada. Canada's top corporate executives received a whopping average compensation of $5.5 million in 2004, a 57-percent gain over 2003. The proportion of Canadian workers employed in low-paying jobs has changed little from what it was back in 1981....

  • Excess for excess' sake.  // Money Management;10/8/2009, Vol. 23 Issue 37, p28 

    The article focuses on the problems of most excessively paid executives in Australia. It notes that executives will have a little fear if their shareholders are empowered on generous remuneration. It states that the institutional shareholders will become proactive in curtailing excessive...

  • Risk and Reward. Higbee, Helene // New Zealand Management;Aug2004, Vol. 51 Issue 7, p37 

    Discusses the factors affecting the increase in senior management pay levels in New Zealand. Trends that influence changes in management pay levels; Ways to balance short-term and long-term business objectives and decisions; Use of long-term incentive programs. INSET: WOULD YOU INCLUDE RISK...

  • Small investors act on fat-cat pay.  // Financial Management;Dec2003/Jan2004, p4 

    Reports on the sentiments of shareholders over executive reward packages in some companies in Great Britain. Consideration of selling shares if a senior director received a pay rise they thought he or she does not deserve it; Number of private investors included in the study; Development of an...

  • Mixed news on exec pay.  // Indianapolis Business Journal;5/16/2005, Vol. 26 Issue 10, p10 

    Discusses a report indicating that the disparity between executives' total compensation and average workers' salary in Indiana as of May 2005.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics