TITLE

PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE IN AN AGE OF NEO-DARWINIAN APOLOGETICS

AUTHOR(S)
FULLER, STEVE
PUB. DATE
December 2009
SOURCE
Ludus Vitalis;2009, Vol. 17 Issue 32, p247
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This paper is a reflection on the shift in the role of philosophers vis-à-vis scientists from 'philosophers of science' to 'philosophers for science', what I have called the 'underlabourer syndrome'. One consequence of this syndrome in the case of Neo-Darwinism is that the theory has become rife with internal interpretive tensions, which philosophers have tolerated by loosening their own criteria for a good scientific theory. This shift in philosophical standards probably reflects the strong cultural standing of Neo-Darwinism. Intelligent design theory, in its quest to achieve intellectual respectability as an opponent to Neo-Darwinism, has somewhat mimicked its opponent by adopting a conception of 'intelligent designer' just as open as that of the Neo-Darwinist conception of 'evolution'. I argue that neither strategy works well, either epistemologically or politically.
ACCESSION #
47179150

 

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics