TITLE

High-Court Hypocrisy

AUTHOR(S)
Alter, Jonathan
PUB. DATE
February 2010
SOURCE
Newsweek (Atlantic Edition);2/1/2010 (Atlantic Edition), Vol. 155 Issue 5, p17
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article offers the author's views on a January 2010 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn election spending limits placed on corporations. The case involving the corporate-backed organization Citizens United and the U.S. Federal Election Commission is discussed. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, dissenting Justice John Paul Stevens, and Senator Dick Durbin are mentioned.
ACCESSION #
47959005

 

Related Articles

  • High-Court Hypocrisy. Alter, Jonathan // Newsweek (Pacific Edition);2/1/2010 (Pacific Edition), Vol. 155 Issue 5, p19 

    The article offers the author's views on a January 2010 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn election spending limits placed on corporations. The case involving the corporate-backed organization Citizens United and the U.S. Federal Election Commission is discussed. Supreme Court Chief...

  • TIMING IS EVERYTHING: A NEW MODEL FOR COUNTERING CORRUPTION WITHOUT SILENCING SPEECH IN ELECTIONS. Levinson, Jessica A. // St. Louis University Law Journal;Spring2011, Vol. 55 Issue 3, p853 

    The article focuses on the consequences of the judgment in the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. U.S. Federal Election Committee (FEC). Information is provided on how the decision struck down all prohibitions on corporations' use of general funds to make campaign donations but failed to...

  • Money Talks.  // Time;Feb1982, Vol. 119 Issue 5, p66 

    The article reports on the impact of the ruling on the reform scheme enacted by Congress in 1976 as a means to clean up presidential and congressional elections in the U.S. It states that the Federal Election Commission has cited a legal spending ceiling of 1,000 dollars for independent groups...

  • The Money Game: Changing the Rules.  // Time;2/9/1976, Vol. 107 Issue 6, p10 

    The article offers information on the U.S. Supreme Court's rulings on campaign finance of the 1976 presidential candidates based on the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974. It says that the law's rule restricting the campaign contributions to 1000 dollars was left intact, though the court...

  • McCutcheon's Supreme Cynicism. Fischer, Brendan // Progressive;Jun2014, Vol. 78 Issue 6, p14 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the McCutcheon v. FEC case over the limit on an individual's direct contribution to political campaign funds. It says that the case was filed by Shaun McCutcheon against the Federal Election Commission (FEC), arguing that preventing him...

  • The Race Is On. Fischer, Raymond L. // USA Today Magazine;Nov2011, Vol. 140 Issue 2798, p18 

    The article asserts that the 2010 decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Citizens United versus (v.) the Federal Election Commission overturning a long-term trend to limit political spending of corporations will set the stage for a lucrative 2012 presidential campaign. It mentions that the...

  • A Gift to Millionaires. Wasserman, David // National Journal;7/5/2008, p3 

    The article focuses on a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that invalidates the millionaire's amendment, the provision of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act that seeks to level the playing field for House or Senate candidates who face wealthy opponents writing big checks for their own campaigns. It...

  • As Political Groups Push Envelope, FEC Gridlock Gives 'De Facto Green Light'. Wang, Marian // Pro Publica;11/ 7/2011, p1 

    The article discusses the challenges faced by the U.S. Federal Election Commission (FEC) to enforce campaign-finance law in the wake of the 2012 U.S. Presidential elections. It says that FEC has yet to provide a single rule to address super political action committees (PACs), which serve as...

  • As Political Groups Push Envelope, FEC Gridlock Gives 'De Facto Green Light'. Wang, Marian // Pro Publica;11/1/2011, p1 

    The article reports on how the U.S. Federal Election Commission (FEC) regulate the changing world of political campaign finance. It mentions its regulation of super political action committees (PACs). It says that the FEC is responsible for the enforcement of federal campaign-finance laws in...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics