TITLE

Foreword: The Marriage Cases-Reversing the Burden of Inertia in a Pluralist Constitutional Democracy

AUTHOR(S)
Eskridge, William N.
PUB. DATE
December 2009
SOURCE
California Law Review;Dec2009, Vol. 97 Issue 6, p1785
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the court's opinion and the doctrinal issues that surround the same-sex marriage in California. Accordingly, the state's political process that has avenues for responding constitutional decisions like the event when voters override the decision of the Supreme Court (SC) In re Marriage Cases through constitutional amendment. On the other hand, the role of judiciary in the pluralists debates on the issue of sexual and gender minorities.
ACCESSION #
48538701

 

Related Articles

  • Foreword: Judicial Opinions as Public Rhetoric. Chemerinsky, Erwin // California Law Review;Dec2009, Vol. 97 Issue 6, p1763 

    The article discusses the opinions of lawyers, judges and scholars pertaining to the decision of Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (SC) on the case In re Marriage Cases in California. The Chief Justice Ronald George explained that the LGBT people have the right to marry under the California...

  • California Supreme Court Overturns Same-sex Marriage Ban.  // New American (08856540);6/9/2008, Vol. 24 Issue 12, p8 

    The article reports that the Supreme Court has ruled against the ban on same-sex marriage in California. The court overturns two state laws that limit marriage to the union between a man and a woman and states that the term "right to marry" extends to same-sex couples. Pro-family groups were...

  • Suit filed to overturn Calif. gay marriage ban. Wojcik, Joanne // Business Insurance;11/10/2008, Vol. 42 Issue 45, p25 

    The article focuses on suit filed to overturn gay marriage ban in California. Opponents of a California ballot measure that would end same-sex marriage filed a lawsuit asking the state Supreme Court to invalidate the proposed constitutional amendment. Proposition 8, an amendment to California's...

  • CALIFORNIA GAY MARRIAGE UPDATE: SUPREMES SAY "YES," COUNTY SUPERS SAY "NO".  // Quest: Wisconsin's Gay News Leader;7/24/2008, Vol. 15 Issue 11, p4 

    The article reports on the decision of the California Supreme Court to allow the state's voters to consider a constitutional amendment in November 2008 that would limit marriage to heterosexual unions. It is revealed that the amendment, Proposition 8, would overrule the Supreme Court decision...

  • Gay couples in California high court ruling.  // Erie Gay News;Jul2008, p13 

    The article reports that California voters will vote on a ban on same-sex marriage in the November 4, 2008 election. However, marriages among gay and lesbian couples in the state began on June 17, 2008 based on the May 15 decision of the California Supreme Court legalizing same-sex marriage. If...

  • Anti-Marriage Group Suffers Setback in Wrangling Over Wording of California Initiative. A. S. L. // Lesbian -- Gay Law Notes;Sep2005, p175 

    The article reports that the anti-marriage group has suffered setback in wrangling over wording of California initiative in the court case Bowler v. Lockyer. The battle over same-sex marriage in California is proceeding along two separate paths, with one leading eventually to the State Supreme...

  • Court likely to grant Prop 8 backers standing. Bajko, Matthew S. // Bay Area Reporter;9/8/2011, Vol. 41 Issue 36, p1 

    No abstract available.

  • NEW NOTES. K. P. // Curve;Jul2008, Vol. 18 Issue 6, p16 

    The article reflects on the effects of the California Supreme Court ruling that lifted the ban on same-sex marriage for the gay community. It notes that the ruling is significant to the community because the state has large population and its decision could influence other states. But it says...

  • Gay marriage opponents in California fight for right to defend Proposition 8. Lloyd, Peter // Pink Paper;9/9/2011, p11 

    The article reports on the plan of the California Supreme Court to review the option of Proposition 8 supporters to defend the anti-same-sex marriage initiative after Federal Judge Vaughn Walker ruled it is unconstitutional in July 2010.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of NEW JERSEY STATE LIBRARY

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics