TITLE

Court ruling allows unlimited corporate spending for political candidates

AUTHOR(S)
Beaubien, Greg
PUB. DATE
February 2010
SOURCE
Public Relations Tactics;Feb2010, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the January 21, 2010 Supreme Court ruling which allowed unlimited corporate expenditures for political candidates in the U.S.
ACCESSION #
48588899

 

Related Articles

  • A Gift to Millionaires. Wasserman, David // National Journal;7/5/2008, p3 

    The article focuses on a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that invalidates the millionaire's amendment, the provision of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act that seeks to level the playing field for House or Senate candidates who face wealthy opponents writing big checks for their own campaigns. It...

  • Clean Elections may finally be washed up. Hamer, Glenn // Inside Tucson Business;9/22/2008, Vol. 18 Issue 16, p32 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to struck down a federal campaign finance law in Tucson, Arizona. The decision aims to finally washed up Arizona's experiment with tax-payer-financed elections. Taxpayer-financed elections restrict candidate's ability to communicate...

  • High-Court Hypocrisy. Alter, Jonathan // Newsweek (Atlantic Edition);2/1/2010 (Atlantic Edition), Vol. 155 Issue 5, p17 

    The article offers the author's views on a January 2010 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn election spending limits placed on corporations. The case involving the corporate-backed organization Citizens United and the U.S. Federal Election Commission is discussed. Supreme Court Chief...

  • High-Court Hypocrisy. Alter, Jonathan // Newsweek (Pacific Edition);2/1/2010 (Pacific Edition), Vol. 155 Issue 5, p19 

    The article offers the author's views on a January 2010 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn election spending limits placed on corporations. The case involving the corporate-backed organization Citizens United and the U.S. Federal Election Commission is discussed. Supreme Court Chief...

  • Election Spending: Reformers On Flood Watch. Jerome, Sara // National Journal;11/7/2009, p2 

    The article focuses on several countermeasures that might be pursued by campaign finance reform advocates in the U.S. if the Supreme Court issues the broadest potential decision in the case Citizens United versus Election Commission. It notes that boosting the influence of small donors is a way...

  • Should Media Consultants Really Jump for Joy? D'Aprile, Shane // Politics (Campaigns & Elections);Mar2010, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p14 

    The article talks about the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the case of Citizens United and the potential response to media consultants to the decision. It cites several disadvantages such as the rise in expenditures, creating a strategic problem for candidate campaigns, more airway clutter, and...

  • CITIZENS UNITED AND THE ROBERTS COURT'S WAR ON DEMOCRACY. Nichol, Gene // Georgia State University Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p1007 

    The author offers his insight on the decision of Roberts Court on the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) in the context of democracy in the U.S. He notes that Citizens United considers campaign finance limitations ridiculous. He considers the campaign finance rulings of...

  • Dems ready for election-year battle on Citizens United bill. Berman, Russell // Hill;4/13/2010, Vol. 17 Issue 37, p3 

    The article reports on the anticipated introduction of a legislation that will counteract a ruling made by the U.S. Supreme Court that allows corporate and union campaign spending in April 2010.

  • CLARIFICATION.  // Hill;5/6/2010, Vol. 17 Issue 50, p3 

    A correction to the article about the concerns of Sodexo Inc., Unilever, and Zurich on the impact of campaign finance reforms on their U.S. subsidiaries is presented.

  • Clergy rap court's ruling on campaign financing.  // Christian Century;3/9/2010, Vol. 127 Issue 5, p16 

    The article reports on a letter signed by over 200 U.S. religious leaders condemning the Supreme Court decision to overturn campaign financial law in January 2010.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics