TITLE

FROM ARMBANDS TO DOUCHEBAGS: How DONINGER V. NIEHOFF SHOWS THE SUPREME COURT NEEDS TO ADDRESS STUDENT SPEECH IN THE CYBER AGE

AUTHOR(S)
Hayes, Allison E.
PUB. DATE
January 2010
SOURCE
Akron Law Review;2010, Vol. 43 Issue 1, p247
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses several First Amendment student speech cases including the Doninger v. Niehoff decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. The author explains that the First Amendment of the Constitution stipulates that the Congress shall make no law that abridged the freedom of speech. She reveals that the first case wherein the First Amendment was recognized to protect public school students' speech was in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette.
ACCESSION #
48659569

 

Related Articles

  • David Riesinan and First Amendment Jurisprudence: From the "Power of the State" to "Protection of Autonomy,' to "Intent to Intimidate " Hickey, Jeremiah // Free Speech Yearbook;2006-2009, Vol. 43, p35 

    The article discusses the article "New Critics of the Court," by David Riesman, who examined the issues of democracy and civil liberties in the U.S. Supreme Court decisions of cases, Sweezy v. New Hampshire, Watkins v. United States and Yates v. United States. It discusses the changes in the...

  • Content and Viewpoint Neutrality: How Fundamental Tenets of First Amendment Law Have Come to be Plagued by Inconsistency and Confusion. Kozlowski, Dan V. // Free Speech Yearbook;2006-2009, Vol. 43, p50 

    The article discusses the criticality of the content- and viewpoint-based speech regulations under the U.S. First Amendment jurisprudence. It states that the Supreme Court has not defined a viewpoint discrimination in cases judged by Justice Warren Burger. According to justice Lewis Powell, the...

  • TALKING DRUGS: THE BURDENS OF PROOF IN POST-GARCETTI SPEECH RETALIATION CLAIMS. Hudson, Thomas E. // Washington Law Review;Oct2012, Vol. 87 Issue 3, p777 

    Law Enforcement agencies fire their employees for speaking out in favor of drug legalization, which leads the employees to sue their former employers for violating their First Amendment Free Speech rights. These employee claims fall under the U.S. Supreme Court's complex speech retaliation test,...

  • Inflammatory Speech: Offense Versus Incitement. Tsesis, Alexander // Minnesota Law Review;2013, Vol. 97 Issue 4, p1145 

    The article discusses freedom of speech in the U.S., the First Amendment to the nation's Constitution, and inflammatory speech as of April 2013, focusing on incitement, an analysis of fighting words, and an individual's right to self-expression. According to the article, states in the U.S. can...

  • HACKING SPEECH: INFORMATIONAL SPEECH AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT. Matwyshyn, Andrea M. // Northwestern University Law Review;Winter2013, Vol. 107 Issue 2, p795 

    The Supreme Court has never articulated the extent of First Amendment protection for instructional or "informational" speech--factual speech that may be repurposed for crime. As technology advances and traditional modes of speech become intertwined with code speech, crafting a doctrine that...

  • DISTRESSING SPEECH AFTER SNYDER--WHAT'S LEFT OF IIED? Meerkins, Andrew // Northwestern University Law Review;Winter2013, Vol. 107 Issue 2, p999 

    Speech has the potential to cause devastating emotional injury. Yet it has been less than a century since intentional infliction of emotional distress--a tort designed to punish a person who, through outrageous conduct or speech, intentionally causes severe distress to another--has entered the...

  • IMAGINARY THREATS TO GOVERNMENT'S EXPRESSIVE INTERESTS. Norton, Helen // Case Western Reserve Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 61 Issue 4, p1265 

    The article discusses the exemption of the government's own speech from the free speech clause scrutiny of the U.S. Supreme Court. It highlights the importance of government expression which enables members of the public to identify the priorities of the government. It emphasizes the court case...

  • PUBLIC DISPLAYS OF AFFECTION…FOR GOD: RELIGIOUS MONUMENTS AFTER MCCREARY AND VAN ORDEN. Clement, Edith Brown // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Winter2009, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p231 

    The author focuses on two U.S. Supreme Court cases involving the public display of the constitutionality of the Ten Commandments under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. One case concerned the display of the text of the Commandments along with a statement indicating the role of the...

  • To DEFER OR NOT TO DEFER? DEFERENCE AND ITS DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT ON FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS IN THE ROBERTS COURT. Calvert, Clay; Hayes, Justin B. // Case Western Reserve Law Review;Fall2012, Vol. 63 Issue 1, p13 

    The article presents information on the concept of deference in context with the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution which protects the rights of individuals to freedom of speech under the Roberts Court which refers to the U.S. Supreme Court. It also mentions about disagreements among the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics