TITLE

A CRITICAL DISCUSSION OF THE STERN AND IPCC ANALYSES OF CARBON EMISSION MITIGATION POSSIBILITIES AND COSTS

AUTHOR(S)
Trainer, Ted
PUB. DATE
February 2010
SOURCE
Energy & Environment;2010, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p49
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Like the Stern Review the IPCC Working Group 3 Reports have been taken as showing that the greenhouse gas emissions problem can be solved at negligible cost, primarily by development of alternative energy technologies. The lengthy Fourth Assessment Report summarises the findings of many studies, rather than present analyses that can be clearly assessed. The argument in this paper is that most and probably all of the studies drawing conclusions about the mitigation potential of alternatives are invalid because they do not consider the possible limitations to renewable energy sources, nuclear energy and geo-sequestration. They are economic modelling studies which take the cost of a unit of carbon mitigation and multiply this by the amount of mitigation required, without regard to the difficulties and limits affecting the extent to which these sources can be scaled up. If the greenhouse problem is to be solved by resort to these technologies then the magnitude of the scale-ability problem is huge. This paper argues that there are major reasons why the alternatives cannot be scaled up sufficiently, and that it is not possible to explain how the anticipated 2050 energy budget could be met without exceeding safe greenhouse limits. If this analysis is sound Stern and the IPCC have been seriously misleading and the greenhouse problem cannot be solved at any cost in a society that is committed to affluent living standards and economic growth. The discussion accepts the climate science in both sources, and does not dispute the desirability of moving to renewable energy.
ACCESSION #
49548545

 

Related Articles

  • Plan B for Climate Change. Kutscher, Chuck // Solar Today;Jun2009, Vol. 23 Issue 5, p18 

    The article discusses the geoengineering ideas which aims to make up with the damage that greenhouse gas emissions are causing to the Earth. These include the injection of 5 million tons of sulfur dioxide every year, the concept of shading the Earth using computer-controlled mirror and the...

  • A Fine Act to Follow When it comes to renewable energy, Germany is the undisputed leader. Taylor, Jennifer; Kitchell, Valerie; Balabanowicz, Julia // Alternatives Journal (AJ) - Canada's Environmental Voice;2008, Vol. 34 Issue 5/6, p18 

    The article discusses Germany's role in stimulating the renewable energy market and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Germany's Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG), enacted in 2000, is said to be most effective in greenhouse gas mitigation. EEG was responsible for reducing 44 million tonnes of...

  • Climate panel offers grounds for optimism. Hopkin, Michael // Nature;5/10/2007, Vol. 447 Issue 7141, p120 

    The article reports on the optimistic analysis conducted by the U.S. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on the possibility of mitigating climate change. According to the IPCC experts, the range of options for getting the climate under control, as well as stemming the greenhouse...

  • A call to arms on emissions. Schoenberg, Martin // Utility Week;4/18/2014, p19 

    The article offers information on plans of European Union (EU) leaders to important decisions on emissions targets in October 2013. Topics discussed include EU leaders to insist on a 40 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions levels by 2030, a report by the Intergovernmental Panel on...

  • Fix historical responsibility for green house emissions, Brazil tells IPCC.  // Chemical Business;Nov2013, Vol. 27 Issue 11, p28 

    The article reports on the proposal made by Brazil as of late 2013 that the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) should officially study the historical responsibility of countries for accumulated greenhouse gas emissions. The study results will be used as basis for...

  • Uncertainty and the IPCC. An editorial comment. Webster, Mort // Climatic Change;Jan2009, Vol. 92 Issue 1/2, p37 

    The author reflects on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). He argues that the community should have analysis on models and projections concerning various issues including emissions or mitigation, while IPCC should summarize the literature. The lack of global uniform coverage of...

  • Probabilistic estimation of future emissions of isoprene and surface oxidant chemistry associated with landuse change in response to growing food needs. Hardacre, C. J.; Palmer, P. I.; Baumanns, K.; Rounsevell, M.; Murray-Rust, D. // Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics;2013, Vol. 13 Issue 11, p5451 

    We quantify the impact of land-use change, determined by our growing demand for food and biofuel production, on isoprene emissions and subsequent atmospheric oxidant chemistry in 2015 and 2030, relative to 1990, ignoring compound climate change effects over that period. We estimate isoprene...

  • Bucking The Narrative. Investor's Business Daily // Investors Business Daily;11/13/2013, pA12 

    The article offers the author's insights regarding the data from the United Nations's (UN's) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to be discussed during its meeting in Warsaw, Poland in November 2013. The author says that IPCC will revise its data regarding carbon dioxide emissions...

  • Features.  // Utility Week;2/13/2009, Vol. 30 Issue 7, p19 

    This section offers news briefs concerning public utilities. A report commissioned for National Grid stated that renewable gas is capable of contributing to the renewable energy and carbon reduction targets for 2020 in Great Britain. The European Council on Foreign Relations mentioned that there...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics