Settle the score

April 2010
Missoula Independent;4/22/2010, Vol. 21 Issue 16, p10
The author comments on the move of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to sue investment banking firm Goldman Sachs for fraudulently misleading investors in Montana. The author believes that it is politically motivated because the three Democrats on the commission voted to pursue the case, while two opposed. Also discussed is how Goldman destroyed the Montana Power Co. (MPC) and how it devastate investors and consumers.


Related Articles

  • Goldman Sachs Feels The Heat, Making It Tough For Advisors. Conrad, Lee; Menchaca, Paul // On Wall Street;May2010, Vol. 20 Issue 5, p13 

    The article presents information on a case filed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against Goldman Sachs and its impact on the financial advisory industry. According to legal experts, the case has added pressure to the debate over whether legislators should create a single...

  • Seeking Shelter. Rutkin, Alan // Best's Review;Aug2010, Vol. 111 Issue 4, p65 

    The article discusses the impact of the court case filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against Goldman Sachs & Co. and its employee in the U.S. The author believes that the lawsuit filed by SEC may affect one or more restrictions on its directors and officers (D&O) insurance...

  • Case comment: the need for careful analysis of the statistical summary in the response to the complaint in the SEC v. Goldman Sachs case. GASTWIRTH, JOSEPH L. // Law, Probability & Risk;Mar2011, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p77 

    In its response to charges by the Securities and Exchange Commission that the investment bank misled investors about the role a hedge fund manager had in selecting a securities portfolio involving subprime mortgages, the firm submitted statistics to support its argument that the losses incurred...

  • The SEC's Big Bet Against Goldman Sachs. Daugherty, Will // Securities Litigation Journal;Summer2010, Vol. 20 Issue 4, p1 

    The article reports on the complaint filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against Goldman Sachs & Co. and its vice president Fabrice Tourre allegedly for misleading statements and omissions on the company's role as underwriter of privately placed notes issued under the ABACUS...

  • THE OATH. McGrath, Ben // New Yorker;5/31/2010, Vol. 86 Issue 15, p25 

    The article discusses a focus among business students and leaders on business ethics. The effect of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) suit against the Goldman Sachs banking firm on public opinion concerning entrepreneurs, hedge-fund managers, and bankers in the U.S. is examined...

  • The SEC v. Goldman Sachs: Reputation, Trust, and Fiduciary Duties in Investment Banking. Davidoff, Steven M.; Morrison, Alan D.; Wilhelm, Jr., William J. // Journal of Corporation Law;Spring2012, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p529 

    The article focuses on the U.S. court case U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Goldman Sachs, which dealt with fiduciary duties in investment banking. Topics include trust-based agreements, the management and regulation of investment banks in the U.S., and synthetic collateralized debt...

  • Decision clarifies misappropriation theory of insider trading. POST, ASHLEY // InsideCounsel;Dec2012, Vol. 23 Issue 252, p54 

    The article briefly discusses the court case Securities and Exchange Commission versus Obus wherein the U.S. Court of Appeals of the 2nd Circuit ruled that an individual who receives inside information may be liable for insider trading under the misappropriation theory.

  • The SEC's proxy access rule is overturned.  // Corporate Board;Sep/Oct2011, Vol. 32 Issue 190, p27 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the federal appellate court in Washington D.C. annulled the "proxy access" rule of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on July 2011 because of deficiencies on company proxy materials for director elections which was identified by the court.

  • Broad Reading of Rule 10b-5 Nixed. Maleske, Melissa // InsideCounsel;Jun2010, Vol. 21 Issue 222, p70 

    The article reports on the ruling by the U.S. First Circuit in the case Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) v. Tambone rejecting a broad interpretation of SEC Rule 10b-5.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics