TITLE

A Triumph for Political Speech

AUTHOR(S)
Rubin, Jennifer
PUB. DATE
May 2010
SOURCE
Commentary;May2010, Vol. 129 Issue 5, p16
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the case of the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, in which the court struck down the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002. It describes McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform and its goal to limit contributions from special interest groups, the documentary film "Hillary: The Movie" and its free speech rights to sell and market the film, and the history of the campaign finance law.
ACCESSION #
49814699

 

Related Articles

  • Super PACs. Briffault, Richard // Minnesota Law Review;2012, Vol. 96 Issue 5, p1644 

    The article discusses U.S. campaign finance reform and super political action committees (Super PACs) in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the 2010 case Citizens United v. Federal Election Committee (FEC). Independent financing for political campaigns and advertisements is...

  • Donor Disclosure: Undermining the First Amendment. Mitchell, Cleta // Minnesota Law Review;2012, Vol. 96 Issue 5, p1755 

    An essay is presented on the legal aspects of American political campaign donations, including an analysis of the protections afforded to citizens under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election...

  • CITIZENS DIVIDED BY CITIZENS UNITED: HOW THE RECENT SUPREME COURT DECISION AFFECTS SMALL BUSINESS IN POLITICS. MENDRALA, MALLORY E. // Entrepreneurial Business Law Journal;2012, Vol. 7 Issue 1, p253 

    The article discusses the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the 2010 case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The ruling removed the ban on corporate independent expenditures and upheld corporation-dominated political campaigns. The advantages of small corporations and businesses...

  • CONTRACTING AROUND CITIZENS UNITED. Sitaraman, Ganesh // Columbia Law Review;Apr2014, Vol. 114 Issue 3, p755 

    The Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. FEC is widely considered a major roadblock for campaign finance reform, and particularly for limiting third party spending in federal elections. In response to the decision, commentators, scholars, and activists have outlined a wide range of...

  • PUBLIC CORRUPTION CONCERNS AND COUNTER-MAJORITARIAN DEMOCRACY DEFINITION IN CITIZENS UNITED V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION. Kimmel, Daaron // Chicago-Kent Law Review;2012, Vol. 87 Issue 1, p265 

    In determining the shape of the free speech rights and anti-corruption concerns that courts must balance in campaign finance cases, judges are influenced by their own underlying understandings of what an ideal democracy should look like. For judges to decide whether the government is...

  • Corps. are people too, Court says. Flokas, Anastasios Nicholas // Pipe Dream;1/29/2010, Vol. 77 Issue 2, p9 

    In this article, the author discusses the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the case of Citizens United versus Federal Election Commission on every citizens of the country.

  • Former Lobbyist Guts Campaign Finance Reform. CONASON, JOE // Progressive Populist;5/15/2014, Vol. 20 Issue 9, p18 

    The article focuses on the role of Anthony Kennedy, associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, in the political campaign finance reform in the U.S. as of May 2014 as he has dismissed the notion that corruption will arise due to political campaign contributions in the Citizens United court case.

  • Dark-Money Dems. Miller, Zeke // Time;11/25/2013, Vol. 182 Issue 22, p20 

    The article discusses the U.S. Democratic Party in relation to campaign financing, independent expenditure political action committees (super PACs), and the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the Citizens United case which reportedly overturned a restriction which prevented corporations and others...

  • Inside the Court.  // Supreme Court Debates;Jan2010, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p4 

    The article discusses the status of cases granted certiorari by the U.S. Supreme Court for the October 2009 term and a holdover case from the 2008 term. The Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case was reportedly reargued on September 9, 2009 after certiorari was granted on November...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics