TITLE

SAVING BUCKLEY: CREATING A STABLE CAMPAIGN FINANCE FRAMEWORK

AUTHOR(S)
Abraham, J. Robert
PUB. DATE
May 2010
SOURCE
Columbia Law Review;May2010, Vol. 110 Issue 4, p1078
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Since 1976, Buckley v. Valeo's contribution-expenditure distinction has been the touchstone of the campaign finance framework. Currently, lower courts are addressing the constitutionality of contribution limits to independent expenditure committees and some have adopted doctrinal approaches that directly threaten Buckley's survival. This Note suggests an alternative approach to the independent expenditure committee question that stabilizes campaign finance jurisprudence around Buckley. Such an approach will provide future reformers with clear constitutional rules and sufficient flexibility to effectively address campaign finance problems.
ACCESSION #
51202037

 

Related Articles

  • Money Managers. Tomasky, Michael // Newsweek Global;2/22/2013, Vol. 161 Issue 8, p1 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, which deals with campaign finance reform in the U.S. Topics include the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the "spending as speech" doctrine from...

  • J. SKELLY WRIGHT'S DEMOCRATIC FIRST AMENDMENT. Kalb, Johanna // Loyola Law Review;Spring2015, Vol. 61 Issue 1, p107 

    An essay is presented on Justice J. Skelly Wright's opinion in a court case Buckley v. Valeo as a judge of the Circuit Court, and on first democratic amendment in the constitution related to campaign funding. Topics discussed include criticism made by Wright on the United States Supreme Court's...

  • Is "Dependence Corruption" the Solution to America's Campaign Finance Problems? Cain, Bruce E. // California Law Review;Feb2014, Vol. 102 Issue 1, p37 

    U.S. campaign finance regulation is currently in bad shape. The combination of congressional inaction, regulatory ineffectiveness, and constitutional constraint perpetuates a status quo that no one intended and many deplore. Public financing for presidential elections is effectively dead, while...

  • Know Your Political Theory. Shapiro, Robert E. // Litigation;Fall2014, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p59 

    The article offers information on the history, development, and significance of the U.S. Constitution in establishing and setting the structure of political theory with reference to the U.S. Chief Justice John Marshall's in McCulloch v. Maryland. It discusses the judicial decision of the U.S....

  • JUDGE J. SKELLY WRIGHT: POLITICS, MONEY, AND EQUALITY. Lee, Carol F. // Loyola Law Review;Spring2015, Vol. 61 Issue 1, p93 

    An essay is presented on Judge J. Skelly Wright's opinion towards campaign funds in politics, racial inequality and economic inequality. Topics discussed include his decisions in cases related to corruptions in government, approval of the campaign finance legislation by the United States'...

  • CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--FIRST AMENDMENT-AGGREGATE LIMITS ON CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS VIOLATE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. GODWIN, ERIN // Cumberland Law Review;2015, Vol. 45 Issue 3, p639 

    The article discusses U.S. Supreme Court cases including McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) and Citizens United v. FEC, focusing on the court's decision on how limits on campaign contributions violate First Amendment rights. Other topics include quid pro quo corruption, how the FEC...

  • Passing the Buckley. Rosen, Jeffrey // New Republic;10/27/97, Vol. 217 Issue 17, p4 

    Contends that a successful campaign finance reform in the U.S. can only be made by revisiting the arguments used by the Supreme Court in its 1976 ruling on the case Buckley versus Valeo. Examination on the arguments of the Supreme Court; Distinction made by the Supreme Court between...

  • CAMPAIGN FINANCE REGULATION.  // Supreme Court Debates;Mar2015, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p6 

    An excerpt from the report "The Constitutionality of Campaign Finance Regulation: Buckley v. Valeo and Its Supreme Court Progeny" in the November 18, 2008 issue is presented.

  • FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND RELIGION--OCTOBER 2009 TERM. Neuborne, Burt; Dorf, Michael C. // Touro Law Review;Sep2011, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p63 

    The article highlights the First Amendment Freedoms of Speech and Religion involving significant cases of the October 2009 term of the Supreme Court in the U.S. It focuses on the court system decisions in dealing with campaign financing issues, support to foreign terrorist groups, public...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics