TITLE

How Not to Attack Intelligent Design Creationism: Philosophical Misconceptions About Methodological Naturalism

AUTHOR(S)
Boudry, Maarten; Blancke, Stefaan; Braeckman, Johan
PUB. DATE
August 2010
SOURCE
Foundations of Science;Aug2010, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p227
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In recent controversies about Intelligent Design Creationism (IDC), the principle of methodological naturalism (MN) has played an important role. In this paper, an often neglected distinction is made between two different conceptions of MN, each with its respective rationale and with a different view on the proper role of MN in science. According to one popular conception, MN is a self-imposed or intrinsic limitation of science, which means that science is simply not equipped to deal with claims of the supernatural (Intrinsic MN or IMN). Alternatively, we will defend MN as a provisory and empirically grounded attitude of scientists, which is justified in virtue of the consistent success of naturalistic explanations and the lack of success of supernatural explanations in the history of science (Provisory MN or PMN). Science does have a bearing on supernatural hypotheses, and its verdict is uniformly negative. We will discuss five arguments that have been proposed in support of IMN: the argument from the definition of science, the argument from lawful regularity, the science stopper argument, the argument from procedural necessity, and the testability argument. We conclude that IMN, because of its philosophical flaws, proves to be an ill-advised strategy to counter the claims of IDC. Evolutionary scientists are on firmer ground if they discard supernatural explanations on purely evidential grounds, instead of ruling them out by philosophical fiat.
ACCESSION #
51549137

 

Related Articles

  • Evolution vs. Creation. Donnelly, Matt // Evolution vs. Creation -- Research Starters Education;4/1/2018, p1 

    This article discusses the legal issues surrounding the teaching of creationism and evolution in public school science classrooms in the United States. Since the early 20th century, parents, teachers, and politicians have often been embroiled in contentious debates regarding freedom of religion...

  • Gaps, Design, & "Theistic" Evolution: A Counter Reply to Robert A. Larmer. Lamoureux, Denis O. // Christian Scholar's Review;Fall2007, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p101 

    The author offers a counter reply to Robert A. Larmer for his comments on his paper presented in "Intelligent Design and Theistic Evolution: A Reply to Dennis Lamoureux." The author outlines problems that he observed in the origins controversy which include the difficulty with the term theistic...

  • "Intelligent Design": A Lamb in Wolf's Clothing. Dobson, Geoffrey // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Sep/Oct2006, Vol. 26 Issue 5, p34 

    The article presents the author's comments on intelligent design (ID) practices. He criticized ID advocates who claim that ID should be taught in the science classroom as an alternative to the theory of natural selection. He explained why ID advocates particularly focus on scientist Chales...

  • The science in the intelligent design debate: teach it like it is. Bateman, Philip W.; Moran-Ellis, Jo // South African Journal of Science;Jul2007, Vol. 103 Issue 7/8, p271 

    INTELLIGENT DESIGN,THE NEW INCARNATION of creationism, is appearing in schools and universities across the world. The stock response by scientists seems to be: 'It is not science'. What proponents of intelligent design and irreducible complexity have managed to do, however, is introduce enough...

  • Designed for Controversy: the Religious Right's New Creationism. Boston, Rob // Humanist;Jan/Feb2006, Vol. 66 Issue 1, p35 

    This article focuses on the controversy over the constitutionality of teaching intelligent design in U.S. schools. The article wonders what the court's ruling would be on the first legal challenge to intelligent design. Some arguments raised against teaching intelligent design in schools are...

  • Religion, Science, and Explanation. Dawes, Gregory W. // Ars Disputandi (AD);2012, Vol. 12, p19 

    A recent legal ruling in the United States regarding 'intelligent design' (ID) argued that ID is not science because it invokes a supernatural agent. It therefore cannot be taught in public schools. But the important philosophical question is not whether ID invokes a supernatural agent; it is...

  • The real dirty secret of academic publishing. Svetlov, Vladimir // Nature;10/21/2004, Vol. 431 Issue 7011, p897 

    Comments on the article about intelligent design, published in the 2004 issue of the periodical "Nature". Suggestion that getting an intelligent-design paper into a peer-reviewed journal is an achievement for creationism; Failure of the article to present new arguments; Rampant proliferation of...

  • Whither "Intelligent Design" Creationism? Lerner, Lawrence S. // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Jul/Aug2009, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p18 

    The article discusses the historical and philosophical evolution of "intelligent design" creationism. It explores on various related concepts of creationism which have helped creationists to introduce the supernatural works into observable nature. It also talks about the biological concepts...

  • The Evolutionary Origins of Genetic Information. Freeland, Stephen // Perspectives on Science & Christian Faith;Dec2011, Vol. 63 Issue 4, p240 

    Any living branch of science achieves progress by testing new ideas. The results of these tests determine whether each new idea is accepted as a change to what we thought we knew, is dismissed as incorrect, or simply stagnates, owing to a lack of clear evidence. For evolutionary theory, one such...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics