TITLE

Preventing Common Hazardous Waste Violations

AUTHOR(S)
Jones, Gary
PUB. DATE
July 2010
SOURCE
Printing Industries of America: The Magazine;Jul2010, Vol. 2 Issue 4, p44
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the environmental issue in the printing industry for legal purposes in the U.S. It cites two printing companies who were penalized for improper hazardous waste management and as a result in which the fined is from 15,000 dollars to 20,000 dollars. It lists several common reasons for the failure of companies to pass hazardous waste inspections including improper assignment of waste codes, not identifying hazardous wastes and improper disposal.
ACCESSION #
53974911

 

Related Articles

  • It's the Pits.  // Time;5/2/1983, Vol. 121 Issue 18, p88 

    The article reports that the U.S. Justice Department has filed a lawsuit against thirty one corporations who contributed to the toxic waste at the Stringfellow Acid Pits in California. It states that the Pits was shutdown in 1972 but its dangerous chemicals are said to still threaten residents...

  • Intervention as of right in NEPA cases- Ninth Circuit returns to the fold. WEIS, JULIE // Trends (15339556);May/Jun2011, Vol. 42 Issue 5, p12 

    The article reports on a court decision in the U.S. in which the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on a matter of civil procedure, namely the proper application of Rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) in National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) cases. The court abandoned...

  • INTRODUCTION. Cook, Kylie; Nyberg, Justin // Natural Resources Journal;Spring2014, Vol. 54 Issue 1, preceding p1 

    An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses various reports within the issue on topics including environmental impact assessments (EIA), the U.S. National Environmental Policy Act, and the challenges faced by environmental litigants.

  • NRDC v. EPA, 489 F.3d 1250 (D.C. Cir. 2007). Perry, Armand M. // Tulane Environmental Law Journal;Dec2008, Vol. 22 Issue 1, Special section p12 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff argues two rules proclaimed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) which has violated the Clean Air Act (CAA). These include the Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CISWI) Rule which was objected by four environmental...

  • EPA, State Regulators Sue 17 Companies Over PA Superfund Site Costs.  // Hazardous Waste/Superfund Alert;11/15/2012, Vol. 34 Issue 19, p8 

    The article discusses the move of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection to sue 17 companies to recover costs associated with cleaning up a Superfund site in Lawrence County.

  • Rumpke fights to expand. Johnson, Jim // Waste News;1/8/2007, Vol. 12 Issue 18, p6 

    The article reports that Rumpke Consolidated Cos. Inc. has filed a lawsuit in Hamilton County Common Pleas Court in order to expand the company's flagship landfill by more than 200 acres. The company has filed the lawsuit after the trustees of Colerain Township, Ohio, denied an expansion request...

  • ENVIRONMENTAL LAW.  // International Law Update;Mar2003, Vol. 9, p35 

    Noting similarity between the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and provincial cleanup legislation, British Columbia Court of Appeal holds that governmental certificate that site is contaminated is not prerequisite to suit by private remediator...

  • Reasonable Bases for Apportioning Harm under CERCLA. Guo, Robert M. // Ecology Law Quarterly;2010, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p317 

    The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) imposes joint and several liability on parties responsible for a single and indivisible incident of hazardous substances contamination. Joint and several liability may be avoided, however, by proving that...

  • EPA Reopens Public Comment for Disputed HazWaste Rule. Sissell, Kara // Chemical Week;9/6/2006, Vol. 168 Issue 30, p39 

    The article discusses the actions of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to reissue public comment for its hazardous waste combustion rule. The EPA request for comment is attempt to resolve some administrative issues, including allegations by environmental groups and others that EPA...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics