September 2001
Overdrive;Sep2001, Vol. 41 Issue 9, p19
Trade Publication
Focuses on the bill passed by the United States House permitting oil and gas drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. Reduction of the dependency on foreign sources of energy; Swithcover of the mandates regarding the phase-in of low-sulfur diesel fuel; Views of president George W. Bush regarding the bill.


Related Articles

  • US offshore energy prospects are brighter.  // Chemical Market Reporter;1/9/2006, Vol. 269 Issue 1, p8 

    This article reports that a legislative bill to tap the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) in Alaska to energy development has been defeated by the U.S. This may actually improve chances for opening more of the U.S. outer continental shelf (OCS) for the gas-dependent chemical industry. An...

  • Energy supply bill clears House panel. Laws, Forrest // Western Farm Press;10/15/2005, Vol. 27 Issue 21, p16 

    Reports on the move of the House Resources Committee to pass legislation that would open a portion of the Arctic National Wildlife refuge to drilling for oil in Alaska. Opposition from environmental organizations; Detail of the area covering the drilling plan; Capability of the project on...

  • Legislative Background.  // Congressional Digest;Jun/Jul2001, Vol. 80 Issue 6/7, p173 

    Reports on legislative bills related to the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. Legislative choices of the 107th Congress; Energy policy of United States President George W. Bush's administration.

  • GOP wants ANWR drilling to pay for infrastructure boost.  // Hill;11/14/2011, Vol. 18 Issue 157, p24 

    The article reports on the proposal of the Republicans to use energy development fundings for the infrastructure spending of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) expansion project in the U.S. in 2011.

  • MarkUp.  // National Parks;Jul/Aug91, Vol. 66 Issue 7/8, p11 

    Presents a list of key national-park legislation currently before Congress, including its purpose and current status. National Energy Security Act (S. 341); Saguaro National Monument (S. 292); Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (H.R. 759, S.109, H.J.Res. 239, S. 39); More. The National Parks and...

  • Energy Conservation Means Economic Stagnation. Freddoso, David // Human Events;4/29/2002, Vol. 58 Issue 16, p5 

    Discusses the impact of the legislative bill proposed by U.S. Senators Tom Daschle and Jeff Bingaman, which will not open any of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge or other government-controlled sites for oil drilling. Effect on taxpayers and consumers; Need to create reliable power sources to...

  • Markup.  // National Parks;May/Jun91, Vol. 65 Issue 5/6, p13 

    Lists some key congressional bills pertaining to the national parks. Purposes and current status of the legislation; Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (HR 759, S. 109, HR 39, S. 39, S. 344); California Desert Protection Act (S. 21); More.

  • Sneak Attack on Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge -- Now Underway in Congress!  // Guardians of the Wild: Wildlife Report;Spring2005, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p3 

    The article presents information on National Wildlife Refuge of Alaska. Big Oil and their lobbyists have failed repeatedly in the last few years to get their Arctic Refuge oil drilling proposals included in various pieces of congressional legislation. The fight for Arctic Refuge drilling could...

  • House and Senate process rival Energy bills.  // Power Economics;May2003, Vol. 7 Issue 5, p4 

    Reports on the processing of rival energy legislative bills by the U.S. House and the U.S. Senate. Aim of reducing the energy dependence of the country; Promotion of energy resources; Controversy over the proposed drilling of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics