TITLE

STRUCTURING A GROUP'S COMMUNICATION FOR IMPROVED PROBLEM-SOLVING

AUTHOR(S)
Penley, Larry E.
PUB. DATE
September 1978
SOURCE
Journal of Business Communication;Fall78, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p25
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
One of the problems groups face in making decisions is the unstructured communication which limits the number of potential solutions the members propose. This paper evaluates the Nominal Group Technique as a method for structuring a problem-solving group's communication. The technique is evaluated in terms of its ability to produce more potential solutions to a problem than an interacting group and in terms of the perceived satisfaction of the participants.
ACCESSION #
5777720

 

Related Articles

  • Invoking Social Comparison to Improve Electronic Brainstorming: Beyond Anonymity. Shepherd, Morgan M.; Briggs, Robert O.; Reinig, Bruce A.; Yen, Jerome; Nunamaker, Jr., Jay F. // Journal of Management Information Systems;Winter95/96, Vol. 12 Issue 3, p155 

    This paper presents a study of electronic brainstorming (EBS) that begins with theory building, tool development, and experimentation, and ends with practical guidance for facilitators and developers. The paper argues that social loafing impairs the productivity of EBS groups, and that social...

  • Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity. Pinsonneault, Alain; Barki, Henri; Gallupe, R. Brent; Hoppen, Norberto // Information Systems Research;Jun99, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p110 

    Electronic brainstorming (EBS) has been proposed as a superior approach to both nominal brainstorming (working alone) and face-to-face brainstorming (verbal). However, existing empirical evidence regarding EBS's superiority over nominal brainstorming is weak. Through a comprehensive examination...

  • Brainstorm Business. Hartman, Taylor // Leadership Excellence;Feb2005, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p14 

    Examines the significance of brainstorming in helping work teams to come up with innovative ideas, products, services, and solutions. Evaluation of the personalities of employees that participates in brainstorming sessions; Ground rules in brainstorming sessions; Phases of brainstorming sessions.

  • Group decision-making--Part II. Gautschi, T. F. // Design News;9/17/90, Vol. 46 Issue 18, p180 

    The article focuses on the group decision making processes. Brainstorming and synectics are the two formalized decision making processes. Synectics is a variation of brainstorming, it keeps the participants unaware of the problem by using a key word or phrase. A brainstorming is a least formal...

  • Frontiers in GDN Research � Introduction. Koeszegi, Sabine; Vetschera, Rudolf // Group Decision & Negotiation;Jul2007, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p283 

    The article discusses frontiers of the Group Decisions and Negotiations (GDN) research. GDN research was designed to develop normative concepts of equitable solutions to improve understanding of decision and negotiation process through empirical and analytical methods and to support decision...

  • On the Measurement of Ideation Quality. REINIG, BRUCE A.; BRIGGS, ROBERT O.; NUNAMAKER JR., JAY F. // Journal of Management Information Systems;Spring2007, Vol. 23 Issue 4, p143 

    Ideation is a key step in organizational problem solving, so researchers have developed a variety of technological interventions for improving ideation quality, which we define as the degree to which an ideation activity produces ideas that are helpful in attaining a goal. In this paper, we...

  • No Innate Phases in Group Problem Solving. Seeger, John A. // Academy of Management Review;Oct83, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p683 

    A widely accepted empirical study (Bales & Strodtbeck, 1951)) concludes that "many staff conferences, committees, and similar groups" progress through predictable sequential phases in problem solving. Reexamination suggests that the conclusion is wrong. Only those subject groups that had never...

  • The Management of Decision-Making Within the Firm: Three Strategies for Three Types of Decision-Making. Delbecq, Andre L. // Academy of Management Journal;Dec1967, Vol. 10 Issue 4, p329 

    This article is a theoretical model dealing with group structures and processes for decision-making in instances of "programmed," "creative" and "compromise" problem solving.

  • Team Problem Solving.  // Team Problem Solving - Competency Center;Jan2013, p1 

    No abstract available.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics