TITLE

AMERYKAŃSKIE DZIAŁANIA ANTYTERRORYSTYCZNE NA POCZĄTKU XXI WIEKU

AUTHOR(S)
WEJKSZNER, ARTUR
PUB. DATE
December 2010
SOURCE
Przeglad Zachodni;2010, Issue 4, p89
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
"Global war against terrorism" (GWAT) was a direct result of the terrorist attacks on the United States by Islamic fundamentalists in September 2001. The aims of GWAT formulated during the presidency of George W. Bush related to two time horizons (short-term and long-term) and two planes of involvement (military and propaganda). The article focuses entirely on presenting the range and effects of the USA's involvement in GWAT on the military plane. The USA's strategic aim was to fight Islamic terrorists and regimes supporting them (e.g. the Taliban regime in Afghanistan or Saddam Hussein s in Iraq). The change of name from GWAT to "overseas special operations" (OSO) during Barack Obama's presidency mirrors the American administration s evolving perception on of the USA's involvement in contemporary asymmetrical conflicts. Attention is also drawn to the positive effects of American military operations in the Philippines and the so-called Horn of Africa, both in the aspect of strategy and operation.
ACCESSION #
58086457

 

Related Articles

  • Point: Justification for the War on Terror. Pearson, John // Points of View: War on Terror;3/1/2016, p5 

    This article presents an argument that the United States-led war on terrorism is justified. Significant and proactive action against terrorists were long overdue by the time the attacks of September 11, 2001 made it clear that terrorism threatens the lives, freedoms and economic well-being of...

  • Counterpoint: Why the War on Terror Cannot Be Won. McFadden, Terri // Points of View: War on Terror;3/1/2016, p6 

    This article presents an argument against the United States-led war on terror. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 spurred the U.S. government to fight terrorism both at home and abroad. Despite the expenditure of huge sums of money, and uncounted hours of time, it has become clear that...

  • War on Terror: Guide to Critical Analysis.  // Points of View: War on Terror;3/1/2016, p4 

    This article offers a critical guide to the controversial issue of the U.S. global war on terrorism. The article discusses criteria in understanding the issue, such as distinguishing between fact and opinion and recognizing point and counterpoint arguments. Also presented are exercises that help...

  • COUNTERINSURGENCY OPERATIONS. Wojdakowski, Walter // Infantry;Sep/Oct2007, Vol. 96 Issue 5, p1 

    The author discusses the future for U.S. infantrymen in counterinsurgency operations, the need for adaptive leaders and soldiers and some new innovations. Today's infantrymen are the cutting edge of a lethal, offensive force, and hence must rapidly execute across the full spectrum of operations...

  • A instrumentalização da defesa dos direitos humanos: os interesses políticos por trás da guerra contra o terrorismo. JÚNIOR, HERMES MOREIRA // Meridiano 47 - Boletim de Análise de Conjuntura em Relações I;dic2008, Issue 101, p45 

    This text aims to analyze how the War on Terrorism's Doctrine has created a speech of protection of human rights, but using it as an instrument according to its strategic priorities.

  • Developing a National Counterinsurgency Capability for the War on Terror. Hillen, John // Military Review;Jan/Feb2007, Vol. 87 Issue 1, p13 

    The author reflects on issues related to the war on terror. According to the author, the national security system of the U.S. provides overwhelming capability to defeat conventional, state-based threats, but it is not organized to deliver the coordinated support to political, economic, civil and...

  • Beyond the 'War on Terror': Hegemony, Violence, and the 'Global Democratic Revolution'. Gills, Barry K. // Global Dialogue;Summer/Autumn2006, Vol. 8 Issue 3/4, p90 

    The article offers insights on the approach used by United States to pursue "war on terror" and "global democracy promotion." The author argues that it is difficult to confront a global power structure like U.S. which uses violence while attempting to legitimize itself by constantly appealing to...

  • JUDGMENT, EXPERIENCE, AND LEADERSHIP: CANDIDATE DEBATES ON THE IRAQ WAR IN THE 2008 PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARIES. BOSTDORFF, DENISE M. // Rhetoric & Public Affairs;Summer2009, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p223 

    The examination of 25 pre-primary and primary debates of the 2008 campaign indicates most Republicans, over time, moved toward ever stronger support of President Bush and the surge policy, while continuing to link meeting the challenge in Iraq with the war on terror and moral resolve. The...

  • Can the War on Terror Be Won? Gordon, Philip H. // Foreign Affairs;Nov/Dec2007, Vol. 86 Issue 6, p53 

    The article discusses workable U.S. approaches to the war on terror, with recommendations to first define victory more clearly, which involves accepting that the terrorist threat can never be eradicated completely. Then the authors advise finding ways to discredit the terrorists' ideology and...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics