TITLE

Should the U.S. End Birthright Citizenship?

PUB. DATE
April 2011
SOURCE
New York Times Upfront;4/4/2011, Vol. 143 Issue 12, p22
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents two opposing views on whether the U.S. should end the birthright citizenship in April 2011, which was adopted in 1868 guaranteeing that everyone born in the country is automatically a citizen. According to Senator David Vitter (R-La.), birthright citizenship should end because the 14th Amendment to the Constitution was not made to grant citizenship to the children of people living in the U.S. illegally. For Michele Waslin of the Immigration Policy Center, efforts to remove birthright citizenship are an assault on the Constitution.
ACCESSION #
59687153

 

Related Articles

  • Melancon hits at Vitter's 'rapel' amendment vote. Fabian, Jordan // Hill;10/27/2009, Vol. 16 Issue 125, p25 

    The article focuses on the criticism of U.S. Senator David Vitter by Representative Charlie Melancon because of the objection of Vitter on an amendment that would prevent companies, which require arbitration for sexual assault victims, from receiving federal funds in 2009.

  • Birth Rights. Peñalver, Eduardo Moisés // Commonweal;9/24/2010, Vol. 137 Issue 16, p8 

    The article attempts to explain how the provision of so-called birthright citizenship of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution has stimulated controversy as of 2010. It recalls that conservative politicians were asking for the abolition of birthright citizenship for illegal...

  • Christian right leader says it's payback time. Alpert, Bruce // Christian Century;2/8/2005, Vol. 122 Issue 3, p15 

    Discusses the criticisms raised by former Louisiana state Representative Tony Perkins against Republican Senator David Vitter concerning a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage in the U.S. in February 2005. Profile of Perkins; His comments on the focus of the federal government on...

  • Getting the ban back together.  // Echo Magazine;6/15/2006, Vol. 17 Issue 20, p14 

    Reports on the failure of a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, to garner enough votes in the U.S. Senate in June 7, 2006. Number of votes required for the measure to survive; Statement from Senator David Vitter (R-La), regarding the failure of the bill to be passed; Reaction of GLBT...

  • Term limits in Congress? No way. TUCKER, BRIAN // Crain's Cleveland Business;4/29/2013, Vol. 34 Issue 17, p0010 

    The article expresses disapproval of proposals to limit the term of legislators in the U.S. Congress. Arizona Representative Matt Salmon and U.S. Senator David Vitter have proposed amendments to the U.S. Constitution aimed at limiting members of the House of Representatives and Senate to three...

  • MAKING CHANGES. Gordon, Dónal Kevin // Cobblestone;Dec2007, Vol. 28 Issue 9, p29 

    The article discusses the process of constitutional amendment as provided in Article V of the U.S. Constitution.

  • CONTEST.  // Current Events;9/21/2009, Vol. 109 Issue 3, p8 

    A contest concerning the proposed amendments to the U.S. Constitution by the readers of this journal is presented.

  • AMENDING WITHOUT AMENDMENTS: A CHALLENGE TO THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM. NATSVLISHVILI, VAKHTANG // Constitutional Law Review;Jul2015, Issue 8, p30 

    No abstract available.

  • Is the Constitution Out of Date? Reidinger, Paul // ABA Journal;Sep87, Vol. 73 Issue 9, p52 

    Interviews several legal academics on the issue of whether the 200-year old United States Constitution is in need of amending. Aspects of the constitution that need updating; Social and political problems that need to be addressed should the constitution adopt changes.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics