TITLE

FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND RELIGION--OCTOBER 2009 TERM

AUTHOR(S)
Neuborne, Burt; Dorf, Michael C.
PUB. DATE
September 2011
SOURCE
Touro Law Review;Sep2011, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p63
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article highlights the First Amendment Freedoms of Speech and Religion involving significant cases of the October 2009 term of the Supreme Court in the U.S. It focuses on the court system decisions in dealing with campaign financing issues, support to foreign terrorist groups, public property religious symbols, and disputes on equality and freedom of association. It discusses the cases such as Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and Buckley v. Valeo.
ACCESSION #
60256893

 

Related Articles

  • DOES "THE FREEDOM OF THE PRESS" INCLUDE A RIGHT TO ANONYMITY? THE ORIGINAL MEANING. Natelson, Robert G. // New York University Journal of Law & Liberty;2015, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p160 

    This Article examines relevant evidence to determine whether, as some have argued, the original legal force of the First Amendment's "freedom of the press" included a per se right to anonymous authorship. The Article concludes that, except in cases in which freedom of the press had been abused,...

  • Transforming Corporate Political Media Spending into Freedom of Speech: A Story of Alchemy and Finesse, 1977-78. Kerr, Robert L. // American Journalism;Winter2011, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p34 

    This article documents the late seventies behind-the-scenes battle led by Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr., that forged a five-justice majority for a narrow Supreme Court holding in First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti to bring corporate political media spending within the protections of the...

  • What is the Sound Of A Corporation Speaking? "Just Another Voice," According to the Supreme Court. Berger, Linda L. // Administrative & Regulatory Law News;Spring2010, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p8 

    The author explains the constitutionality of limiting corporate spending in election campaigns and addresses the question of whether the majority in the U.S. Supreme Court observed the rules of the legal conversation within which the court is but one of the speakers. He discusses arguments on...

  • EMPOWERING SMALL DONORS: NEW YORK CITY'S MULTIPLE MATCH PUBLIC FINANCING AS A MODEL FOR A POST-CITIZENS UNITED WORLD. Loprest, Amy; Perskie, Bethany // Fordham Urban Law Journal;Dec2012, Vol. 40 Issue 2, p639 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court cases regarding multiple match system public financing programs including Buckley v. Valeo, Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett, and Citizens United v. Fed. Election Comm'n. Such programs ameliorate the effect of small...

  • POLITICAL SPEECH AND ASSOCIATION RIGHTS AFTER KNOX V. SEIU, LOCAL 1000. Fisk, Catherine L.; Chemerinskyt, Erwin // Cornell Law Review;Jul2013, Vol. 98 Issue 5, p1023 

    In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, and other recent cases, the Supreme Court has given organizations a newly robust First Amendment right to use the entity's money in ways that stakeholders within the organization may find anathema and to...

  • Money Managers. Tomasky, Michael // Newsweek Global;2/22/2013, Vol. 161 Issue 8, p1 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, which deals with campaign finance reform in the U.S. Topics include the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the "spending as speech" doctrine from...

  • McCain-Feingold AND FREE SPEECH: President Barack Obama and major media outlets have chastised the Supreme Court for its ruling overturning McCain-Feingold prohibitions on corporations airing political ads. Kenny, Jack // New American (08856540);3/15/2010, Vol. 26 Issue 6, p10 

    The article discusses issues concerning the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn prohibitions on corporations airing political advertisements under the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 or the McCain-Feingold Act. President Barack Obama castigated the Supreme Court for granting freedom...

  • DEBATE ON CITIZENS UNITED V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION. Abrams, Floyd; Morrison, Alan B.; Collins, Ronald K. L. // Albany Law Review;2013, Vol. 76 Issue 1, p757 

    The article presents a debate on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission in which the court held that political spending is a form of protected speech under the First Amendment of the U.S. constitution. The debate includes several notable...

  • McCain-Feingold Could Be Gutted. Spakovsky, Hans A. Yon // Human Events;7/20/2009, Vol. 65 Issue 25, p18 

    The article examines the provision of electioneering communications under Section 203 of McCain-Feingold law and its relation to the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United versus Federal Election Commission on June 29, 2009. Citizens United complained that the restrictions on promotional...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics