TITLE

PRODUCTS LIABILITY--Application of Strict Liability to the Independent Contractor Who Conforms to the Plans and Specifications of a Nongovernmental Purchaser: Michalko v. Cooke Color & Chem. Corp

AUTHOR(S)
Shubatt, Jacqueline
PUB. DATE
September 1983
SOURCE
Journal of Corporation Law;Fall83, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p113
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Under the tort law doctrine of products liability a manufacturer may be held strictly liable not only for its failure to install safety devices on dangerous products, but also for its failure to warn of the danger which exists. In some cases the manufacturer may be an independent contractor that has contracted with a purchaser that provided plans and specifications for the independent contractor. Courts are split on the question whether strict liability should be extended to the independent contractor when those plans and specifications do not provide for the incorporation of safety devices and the independent contractor does not add them to the product. Recently, however, in Michalko v. Cooke Color & Chem. Corp., the New Jersey Supreme Court extended strict liability to that group of defendants. Because the New Jersey Supreme Court has always been at the forefront of the development of the strict liability doctrine, Michalko may signal a movement toward the resolution of the current split of authority. This article analyzes why the extension of strict liability to independent contractors constitutes the better approach. First, the nature of strict liability and the movement toward extending strict liability to independent contractors will be discussed. Second, the New Jersey Supreme Court's decision in Michalko will be examined. Third, an analysis of the reasoning of Michalko and the other cases which have dealt with the issue will be presented, along with a discussion of how the public policy justifications for strict liability support its extension in this area.
ACCESSION #
6034530

 

Related Articles

  • Probably liable.  // Flying;Feb1994, Vol. 121 Issue 2, p30 

    Cites a report in the Casper, Wyoming, `Star Tribune,' which said a widow is suing the owner of a single-engine airplane that disappeared while hunting a grizzly over Wyoming. No trace of the airplane was ever found but the plaintiff claims the owner and operator of the airplane must have been...

  • Safeguards against suits. Moore, L.J. // U.S. News & World Report;2/27/89, Vol. 106 Issue 8, p78 

    Discusses liability suits for small-business owners. Crimes committed on commercial properties; Examples; Advice.

  • Expert witness standards sought. Hofmann, Mark A. // Business Insurance;12/16/96, Vol. 30 Issue 51, p2 

    Focuses on the hopes of business groups that the Supreme Court agree to review a Kansas case that centered around the question of standards an expert witness' testimony must meet before it was admissible in a product liability lawsuit. Reference to the Supreme Court case Daubert versus Merrell...

  • Fluoride suits show U.K. faces bite of more litigation. Goddard, Sarah // Business Insurance;12/16/96, Vol. 30 Issue 51, p2 

    States that according to lawyers, lawsuits against toothpaste manufacturers are among the signs that products liability-related litigation is on the increase in England. Comments from London barrister, Christopher Clarke; Reference to the lawsuit brought against six pharmaceutical companies by...

  • Products Defendants Gaining. DeBenedictis, Don J. // ABA Journal;Mar1990, Vol. 76 Issue 3, p35 

    Reports on the studies of products liability cases in the United States, separately conducted by the U.S. General Accounting Office and Cornell Law School Professors James Henderson and Theodore Eisenberg. Percentage of plaintiffs' verdicts found to be based on defendants's negligence;...

  • Product Liability and the Verse of Becker, J. Keeffe, Arthur John // American Bar Association Journal;Feb75, Vol. 61 Issue 2, p249 

    Focuses on articles in the spring 1974 issue of the journal 'Duquesne Law Review' about products liability. Transcripts of well-litigated products liability trials; Shortcomings in the use of the expert witness; Criteria that are essential to a proper adjudication of a product liability case.

  • Leaving the battlefield. English, Lawrence K. // Machine Design;8/10/95, Vol. 67 Issue 14, p150 

    Discusses how attorneys should handle product liability cases. Explanation of product defect found in previous trials; Immutability of the product itself; Determination whether plaintiff's claims about product are true.

  • Legal defense is the best offense. Cata, Ricardo J.; Kittredge, David N. // Business Mexico;Aug1995, Vol. 5 Issue 8, p43 

    Explains the role a defense counsel will play in defending a claim already in litigation. Role in the development of a program to prevent products liability in the future; Identification of the maker of the product; Defenses for foreign manufacturers; Two tiers of legal counselling in the...

  • Twenty-five people went on trial in South Korea. Hanson, Cynthia; McLaughlin, Abraham // Christian Science Monitor;8/31/95, Vol. 87 Issue 194, p2 

    Reports trial of 25 people in South Korea over the collapse of a departmental store in June 1995. Condemnation of Chinese and French nuclear test in Seoul.

Share

Other Topics