TITLE

Congress Passes Sweeping Education Law

PUB. DATE
March 2002
SOURCE
NEA Today;Mar2002, Vol. 20 Issue 6, p14
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the provisions of the revised Elementary and Secondary Education Act or No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 in the U.S.. Goals of its required state achievement tests; Scope of the teacher quality provision; Budget allocations.
ACCESSION #
6279203

 

Related Articles

  • NOW CHILDREN LEARN BETTER: REVISING NCLB TO PROMOTE TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS IN STUDENT DEVELOPMENT. Goodman, Chris Chambers // University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender & C;Spring2014, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p84 

    The article discusses the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), the legislation designed to improve public school teacher effectiveness in student development. It looks at the controversial implications of NCLB on teacher effectivenss to student testing outcomes. It also examines the...

  • The Tests We Need, and Why We Need Them.  // NEA Today;Mar2002, Vol. 20 Issue 6, p10 

    Interviews James Popham, a professor at the University of California, Los Angeles who heads a commission to develop a set of requirements for state tests. History of his involvement in the field of testing; Positive and negative aspect of a federal law's emphasis on tests.

  • Giving 'Data' Its Own Assessment. Tacheny, Suzanne; Plattner, Linda // Education Week;5/11/2005, Vol. 24 Issue 36, p37 

    This article reports that pushed there by the federal No Child Left Behind Act, the profusion of school-performance information known by the verbal shorthand "data" has become the star player in the effort to improve schools. Intense pressure applied without a constructive plan to help teachers...

  • Study: Money Is Sufficient to Meet ESEA Testing Rules. Olson, Lynn // Education Week;3/13/2002, Vol. 21 Issue 26, p5 

    Reports on the results of cost-analysis on the Elementary and Secondary Education Act in the United States conducted by Accountability Works. Claim that the testing requirements of the educational law are affordable given the additional federal dollars; Criticism of this report.

  • Improving Teacher Quality. Whitehurst, Grover J. // Spectrum: Journal of State Government;Summer2002, Vol. 75 Issue 3, p12 

    Explores the impact of the reauthorization of the U.S. Elementary and Secondary Education Act on the improvement of teacher quality. Enhancement of academic achievement of disadvantaged children; Alignment between professional development activities and student academic achievement standards;...

  • Glitch denies GI benefits to guardsmen. Tiron, Roxana // Hill;8/4/2009, Vol. 16 Issue 94, p12 

    The article reports on the dismay of the National Guardsmen on a post-9/11 GI Bill due to a glitch which is keeping them from receiving educational benefits for veterans in 2009 in the U.S.

  • N.H. needs a better road map for its school-funding policy. Crosier // New Hampshire Business Review;11/05/99, Vol. 21 Issue 24, p11 

    Addresses the problems concerning school funding in the United States. Arguments against the claim that the solution to the projected education funding deficit is an income or capital gains tax; Principles of the design for a better solution to the school funding problem; Better quality...

  • House approves GOP's school savings plan; budget gets extension. Sack, Joetta L. // Education Week;10/29/97, Vol. 17 Issue 9, p20 

    Reports that the US House has passed a controversial education savings account bill while Congress voted to give itself more days to complete work on an education appropriations bill. Voting to continue federal spending on 1997 levels; White House and Republican lawmakers' contention over...

  • Senate Republicans Try Again on Tax-Free Savings for Education. Robelen, Erik W. // Education Week;03/01/2000, Vol. 19 Issue 25, p29 

    Reports that Senate Republicans in the United States (US) have brought again the Affordable Education Act that was twice vetoed by US President Bill Clinton. Number of votes needed to invoke cloture on the bill; Possible results of the legislation; Chief sponsors of the bill.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics