TITLE

On the supposed limits of physicalist theories of mind

AUTHOR(S)
Dorsey, Jonathan
PUB. DATE
September 2011
SOURCE
Philosophical Studies;Sep2011, Vol. 155 Issue 2, p207
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Is physicalism compatible with either panpsychism or so-called 'fundamental mentality'? Minimal physicalism, I contend, is compatible with both. We should therefore jettison the 'No Fundamental Mentality' constraint, a proposed constraint on the definition of 'the physical', not to mention the false limits it places on physicalist theories of mind.
ACCESSION #
63497701

 

Related Articles

  • IS NEUROSCIENCE ADEQUATE AS THE FORTHCOMING "MINDSCIENCE"? Manzotti, Riccardo; Moderato, Paolo // Behavior & Philosophy;2010, Vol. 38, p1 

    The widespread use of brain imaging techniques encourages conceiving of neuroscience as the forthcoming ''mindscience.'' Perhaps surprisingly for many, this conclusion is still largely unwarranted. The present paper surveys various shortcomings of neuroscience as a putative ''mindscience.'' The...

  • PHYSICALISM, SUPERVENIENCE AND THE FUNDAMENTAL LEVEL. Brown, Robin; Ladyman, James // Philosophical Quarterly;Jan2009, Vol. 59 Issue 234, p20 

    We provide a formulation of physicalism, and show that this is to be favoured over alternative formulations. Much of the literature on physicalism assumes without argument that there is a fundamental level to reality, and we show that a consideration of the levels problem and its implications...

  • Whitehead and Analytic Philosophy of Mind. Shields, George W. // Process Studies;Fall/Winter2012, Vol. 41 Issue 2, p287 

    My purpose in this essay is to provide a critical survey of arguments within recent analytic philosophy regarding the so-called "mind-body problem" with a particular view toward the relationship between these arguments and the philosophy of A.N. Whitehead (and Charles Hartshorne's closely...

  • Through Thick and Thin with Ned Block: How Not to Rebut the Property Dualism Argument. O’Sullivan, Brendan // Philosophia;Dec2008, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p531 

    In “Max Black’s Objection to Mind–Body Identity,” Ned Block seeks to offer a definitive treatment of property dualism arguments that exploit modes of presentation. I will argue that Block’s central response to property dualism is confused. The property dualist...

  • Undefeated dualism. Bogardus, Tomas // Philosophical Studies;Sep2013, Vol. 165 Issue 2, p445 

    In the standard thought experiments, dualism strikes many philosophers as true, including many non-dualists. This 'striking' generates prima facie justification: in the absence of defeaters, we ought to believe that things are as they seem to be, i.e. we ought to be dualists. In this paper, I...

  • Physicalism and the necessary a posteriori. Stoljar, Daniel // Journal of Philosophy;Jan2000, Vol. 97 Issue 1, p33 

    Focuses on posteriori physicalism as a view of the philosophy of mind. Relevance of experience to a belief or statement; Definition of the state of intelligence by philosopher Alan Turing; Impact of posteriori on the knowledge argument; Implications of posteriori physicalism for the...

  • Why Physics Alone Cannot Define the 'Physical': Materialism, Metaphysics, and the Formulation of.... Crook, Seth; Gillett, Carl // Canadian Journal of Philosophy;Sep2001, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p333 

    Examines the relationship among physics, materialism, metaphysics and the formulation of physicalism. Configuration of all philosophical issues and projects; Nature of physicalism attention; Metaphysical roots of physicalism.

  • How to keep the `physical' in physicalism. Melnyk, Andrew // Journal of Philosophy;Dec1997, Vol. 94 Issue 12, p622 

    Presents a study on physicalism. Definition of physical. physicalism; Information on how physicalism is viewed; Circumstances surrounding the arguments pertaining to physicalism.

  • Teaching and Learning are Complex and Evolutionary but Market Forces Can Collide with Quality Practice Change Forces: The Sequel by Michael Fullan. Gutierrez, Cris // Journal of Educational Change;Jun2000, Vol. 1 Issue 2, p219 

    This article reports that teaching and learning, like a bird or a human, are complex and evolutionary. This is because they involve living beings. By logical extension, schools are living systems. This fundamental consciousness informs the understanding of the dynamics at work in schools which...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics